2024 Rose Bowl Betting Odds, Predictions, Preview
The Rose Bowl wrapped up on Monday, January 1, 2024 and bettors saw Michigan hold off Alabama in overtime, 27-20 as 2.5-point favorites in Pasadena, California.
Recap all the 2024 Rose Bowl Betting Odds, Picks, Predictions and History below and be sure to check back for the 2025 installment. if you're ready to bet on college football, use our Caesars Sportsbook bonus code to unlock bonus bets.
Rose Bowl Betting Odds
ALA @ MICH Odds
Time | Open | BetMGM | DraftKings | Caesars | FanDuel | RiversCasino | HardRock | Consensus | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | +1.5 -112 | +2.5 -115 | +2 -110 | +2 -110 | +2.5 -110 | +2 -112 | +2.5 -120 | +2.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | -1.5 -108 | -2.5 -105 | -2 -110 | -2 -110 | -2.5 -110 | -2 -110 | -2.5 -110 | -2.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | o45.5 -110 | o45.5 -115 | o46 -110 | o45.5 -110 | o45.5 -110 | o46.5 -110 | o45.5 -120 | o45.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | u45.5 -110 | u45.5 -105 | u46 -110 | u45.5 -110 | u45.5 -110 | u46.5 -110 | u45.5 -110 | u45.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | -102 | +115 | +110 | +115 | +112 | +320 | even | +112 | |
280 Michigan | -118 | -140 | -130 | -135 | -134 | -500 | -130 | -134 | |
Time | Open | BetMGM | DraftKings | Caesars | FanDuel | RiversCasino | HardRock | Consensus | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | +1.5 -112 | +0.5 -110 | +0.5 -110 | +0.5 even | +1.5 -120 | +1.5 -150 | +0.5 -125 | +2.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | -1.5 -108 | -0.5 -110 | -0.5 -110 | -0.5 -120 | -1.5 -102 | -1.5 +107 | -0.5 -110 | -2.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | o45.5 -110 | N/A | o22.5 -110 | o22.5 -110 | o23.5 +104 | o23.5 -112 | o22.5 -115 | o45.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | u45.5 -110 | N/A | u22.5 -110 | u22.5 -110 | u23.5 -128 | u23.5 -117 | u22.5 -115 | u45.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | -102 | +105 | +110 | +118 | +108 | -106 | N/A | +112 | |
280 Michigan | -118 | -125 | -130 | -140 | -132 | -122 | N/A | -134 | |
Time | Open | BetMGM | DraftKings | Caesars | FanDuel | RiversCasino | HardRock | Consensus | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | +1.5 -112 | N/A | N/A | -0.5 -105 | N/A | N/A | +0.5 -125 | +2.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | -1.5 -108 | N/A | N/A | +0.5 -115 | N/A | N/A | -0.5 -105 | -2.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | o45.5 -110 | N/A | N/A | o22.5 -110 | N/A | N/A | o22.5 -115 | o45.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | u45.5 -110 | N/A | N/A | u22.5 -110 | N/A | N/A | u22.5 -115 | u45.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | -102 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | +112 | |
280 Michigan | -118 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | -134 | |
Time | Open | BetMGM | DraftKings | Caesars | FanDuel | RiversCasino | HardRock | Consensus | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | +1.5 -112 | +0.5 -150 | +0.5 -135 | +0.5 -150 | +1.5 -164 | +1.5 -167 | +0.5 -170 | +2.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | -1.5 -108 | -0.5 +115 | -0.5 +114 | -0.5 +120 | -1.5 +130 | -1.5 +114 | -0.5 +130 | -2.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | o45.5 -110 | N/A | o9.5 -118 | o9.5 -125 | o9.5 -120 | o9.5 -132 | o9.5 -125 | o45.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | u45.5 -110 | N/A | u9.5 -102 | u9.5 -105 | u9.5 -104 | u9.5 +102 | u9.5 -105 | u45.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | -102 | -105 | +102 | even | -100 | -103 | N/A | +112 | |
280 Michigan | -118 | -125 | -122 | -130 | -128 | -132 | N/A | -134 | |
Time | Open | BetMGM | DraftKings | Caesars | FanDuel | RiversCasino | HardRock | Consensus | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | +1.5 -112 | N/A | +5.5 +175 | N/A | +1.5 -145 | N/A | +0.5 -155 | +2.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | -1.5 -108 | N/A | -5.5 -230 | N/A | -1.5 +116 | N/A | -0.5 +120 | -2.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | o45.5 -110 | N/A | o9.5 +160 | N/A | o6.5 -152 | N/A | o10.5 -125 | o45.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | u45.5 -110 | N/A | u9.5 -210 | N/A | u6.5 +116 | N/A | u10.5 -105 | u45.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | -102 | N/A | N/A | N/A | -100 | N/A | N/A | +112 | |
280 Michigan | -118 | N/A | N/A | N/A | -128 | N/A | N/A | -134 | |
Time | Open | BetMGM | DraftKings | Caesars | FanDuel | RiversCasino | HardRock | Consensus | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | +1.5 -112 | N/A | N/A | N/A | +1.5 -164 | N/A | -0.5 +140 | +2.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | -1.5 -108 | N/A | N/A | N/A | -1.5 +130 | N/A | +0.5 -175 | -2.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | o45.5 -110 | N/A | N/A | N/A | o6.5 -114 | N/A | o7.5 -115 | o45.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | u45.5 -110 | N/A | N/A | N/A | u6.5 -114 | N/A | u7.5 -110 | u45.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | -102 | N/A | N/A | N/A | -100 | N/A | N/A | +112 | |
280 Michigan | -118 | N/A | N/A | N/A | -128 | N/A | N/A | -134 | |
Time | Open | BetMGM | DraftKings | Caesars | FanDuel | RiversCasino | HardRock | Consensus | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | +1.5 -112 | N/A | N/A | N/A | +1.5 -172 | N/A | -0.5 +130 | +2.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | -1.5 -108 | N/A | N/A | N/A | -1.5 +136 | N/A | +0.5 -170 | -2.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | o45.5 -110 | N/A | N/A | N/A | o11.5 -112 | N/A | o10.5 -120 | o45.5 -110 | |
280 Michigan | u45.5 -110 | N/A | N/A | N/A | u11.5 -112 | N/A | u10.5 -105 | u45.5 -110 | |
Final | Open | › | › | › | › | › | › | | |
279 Alabama | -102 | N/A | N/A | N/A | -106 | N/A | N/A | +112 | |
280 Michigan | -118 | N/A | N/A | N/A | -120 | N/A | N/A | -134 | |
- Opening point spread: Michigan -2.5
- Opening moneyline: Michigan -135/Alabama +115
- Opening total: Over/Under 45.5 points scored
- Time: 5 p.m. ET Monday, Jan. 1 (ESPN)
UPDATE 2 P.M. ET MONDAY, JAN. 1: Three hours pre-kick, Michigan has advanced to -2.5 in BetMGM's College Football Playoff semifinal odds market. That's up a point from the -1.5 flat/-1.5 (-115) the line has been at since Dec. 7.
The Wolverines opened -1.5 Dec. 3. and hit a low of -1 on Dec. 5.
Alabama is taking 61% of spread bets/60% of spread money. In addition, 68% of moneyline bets/57% of moneyline dollars are on the Crimson Tide. Plus, BetMGM has significant championship futures liability to 'Bama, largely driven by a $205,500 Tide +600 bet made during the preseason. That bet alone would pay out $1.233 million.
"We took some sharp bets today on Michigan, so we're currently sitting -2.5 Michigan," BetMGM trader Seamus Magee said. "However, it's still really heavy 'Bama money coming in. We're definitely rooting for Michigan to knock 'Bama out of our futures liability, and in the win-the-game book, as well."
The total opened at 45.5 and is currently 45.5. It topped out at 46.5 on Dec. 4, hit a low of 44.5 on Dec. 19, went to 45 Thursday and 45.5 Sunday. Ticket count is almost 5/1 and money 8/1 on the Over.
UPDATE 4 P.M. ET FRIDAY, DEC. 29: Three days ahead of kickoff, Michigan is laying 1.5 points in Caesars Sports' CFP semifinal odds market. That matches the Dec. 3 opening number, but there have been a few stops in between. Among them: a high point of Wolverines -2 on Dec. 4 and a low point of pick 'em on Dec. 13.
"We've taken a lot of Alabama action," Caesars lead college football trader Joey Feazel said. "We tested the waters by going to pick 'em. We wanted to see if a sharp thought there was value on Michigan at pick 'em, and they did.
"Within a couple hours, we took a pretty sharp wager on Michigan for $79,000. So we went back to Michigan -1.5."
Even with that bet, Rose Bowl action at Caesars is pretty tilted toward Alabama. But it's well-bet game overall, as well.
"Right now, there's a lot of action on the Rose Bowl. And it makes sense, because these are the two best teams, in our eyes," Feazel said.
Feazel added that Caesars has significant liability to Alabama and Washington in the championship futures market.
The total opened at 46, spent the early part of the month at 45.5 and has been at 45 since Dec. 13.
UPDATE 4:30 P.M. ET FRIDAY, DEC. 22: This matchup, by ticket count, continues to be the most-bet bowl matchup at BetMGM. Part and parcel to that, Alabama is No. 1 in spread tickets and spread money at BetMGM.
Since Dec. 12 at BetMGM (see below update), there's been no spread movement in the College Football Playoff semifinal odds market. Michigan remains -1.5, while tickets and money run about 2/1 on Alabama. So the Wolverines have cut into the advantage slightly; on Dec. 12, it was 2.5/1-plus tickets and 3/1 money on 'Bama.
The Crimson Tide's moneyline advantage has also shortened, but is still significant. Tickets are 4/1 and money 5/1 on Alabama to win outright.
From Dec. 5-Tuesday, the total was nailed to 45.5. On Tuesday, it dipped to 44.5. Still, BetMGM is seeing ticket count of almost 3/1 and money of 2.5/1 on the Over.
UPDATE MIDNIGHT ET TUESDAY, DEC. 12: On Dec. 3, once the matchups were announced, BetMGM opened Michigan -2.5 in its College Football Playoff semifinal odds market. By day's end, Michigan dropped to -1.5, then went to -1 on Dec. 5.
The line returned to Wolverines -1.5 on Dec. 7 and hasn't moved since. Spread ticket count is beyond 2.5/1 and spread money 3/1 on Alabama. Further, moneyline tickets are running 6/1 and moneyline dollars 9/1 on Alabama.
In fact, by ticket count at BetMGM, Alabama is taking three times more spread/moneyline bets than any of the other three CFP semifinalists.
The total opened at 45.5, went to 46.5 Dec. 4 and back to 45.5 Dec. 5. There's been no movement since, with the Over getting 69% of tickets/59% of money.
UPDATE 1:30 P.M. ET SUNDAY, DEC. 3: Michigan (13-0 SU/7-5-1 ATS) had little trouble with Iowa in the Big Ten championship game. The Wolverines rolled 26-0 as 21.5-point favorites and in turn landed the No. 1 seed in the College Football Playoff.
In the Jan. 1 Rose Bowl, the first of games on the College Football Playoff semifinal odds board, Michigan will meet No. 4 Alabama.
The Crimson Tide (12-1 SU/9-4 ATS) edged out unbeaten Florida State for the final CFP slot. In Saturday's SEC title game, Alabama held off Georgia 27-24 as a 5.5-point underdog in the SEC title game.
The SuperBook opened Michigan -2.5 in the College Football Playoff odds for the semifinals.
"Michigan has been considered better than Alabama all season. You've got to favor Michigan ins this game. But the number had to come down a little bit, because Alabama beat Georgia," SuperBook executive director John Murray said this afternoon. "This line is exactly where I think it should be. Michigan will never say this, but you know they wanted to get Florida State instead of Alabama."
Indeed, Murray said the Wolverines would've been close to 10-point favorites against the Seminoles. Instead, oddsmakers, bettors and fans get a great matchup, and at the Rose Bowl, no less. The line has already moved toward the underdog, too, with Michigan quickly shortening to -2.
"The Rose Bowl is always just an absolute monster for handle. So we're happy with that matchup," Murray said. "It sets up to be a much better playoff game for business. These are two extraordinarily public teams. Michigan-Alabama is a real jewel for us."
Murray added The SuperBook does well to Michigan and 'Bama in College Football Playoff championship futures odds. And he has no issue with the Crimson Tide getting in over Florida State.
"You can't really have a College Football Playoff, the national championship of college football, if the SEC is not included. The SEC wins this every year," Murray said.
Click here for Vegas Insider senior reporter Patrick Everson's full College Football Bowl Odds: Spreads, Lines, Trends for Every Bowl Game.
Rose Bowl Best Bet
Rose Bowl Betting Resources
- Date: Monday, January 1, 2024
- TV-Time: ESPN, 5:00 p.m. ET
- Venue: Rose Bowl
- Location: Pasadena, California
Rose Bowl History
The Rose Bowl dates as far back as 1902 and began in 1916 with the matchup hosting schools from the Big Ten and Pac-12 conferences. This traditional matchup ended with the bowl started to participate in championship and semifinal matchups. During years the Rose Bowl is not used as a venue for the postseason, then it reverts back to the original bowl tie-ins. This game takes place at the Rose Bowl from Pasadena, California and is usually played on New Year's Day.
USC has the most appearances (34) and wins (25) in Rose Bowl History, including an epic 52-49 shootout against Penn State which netted the most total points in the history of the 'Granddaddy of them all'. The 59 points scored by the Oregon Ducks in the 2014 season was the most ever in Rose Bowl history.
The Pac-12 got back in the win column in the 2019 installment as Oregon rallied past Wisconsin for a 28-27 win.
The Rose Bowl is part of the College Football Playoff rotation and was part of three semifinal matchups played in 2014, 2018 and 2021. The first two easily went 'over' in those semifinal games, but the 'under' hit in Alabama's rout of Notre Dame in 2021.
- Oregon 59 Florida State 20
- Georgia 53 Oklahoma 48 (2OT)
- Alabama 31 Notre Dame 14
In 2022, it was back to a traditional Big Ten vs. Pac-12 matchup, and it was a classic. Ohio State outlasted Utah by a 48-45 count, with Buckeyes WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba setting an all-time bowl record with 347 receiving yards on 15 grabs with three touchdowns.
In another College Football Playoff Classic in Pasadena, Michigan rallied past Alabama, 27-20 in overtime to reach the National Championship in 2024.
Rose Bowl Betting Results
Year | Matchup | Spread/Totals | ATS Result |
2023 | Michigan 27 Alabama 20 (OT) | Michigan -2.5, 45.5 | Favorite, Under |
2022 | Penn State 35 Utah 21 | Penn State -1, 55 | Favorite, Over |
2021 | Ohio State 48 Utah 45 | Ohio State -4, 65 | Underdog, Over |
2020 | Alabama 31 Notre Dame 14 | Alabama -18.5, 65.5 | Underdog, Under |
2019 | Oregon 28 Wisconsin 27 | Wisconsin -3, 52.5 | Underdog, Over |
2018 | Ohio State 28 Washington 23 | Ohio State -5.5, 55.5 | Underdog, Under |
2017 | Georgia 54 Oklahoma 48 (2OT) | Georgia -2.5, 62.5 | Favorite, Over |
2016 | USC 52 Penn State 49 | USC -7, 60 | Underdog, Over |
2015 | Stanford 45 Iowa 16 | Stanford -6, 51.5 | Favorite, Over |
2014 | Oregon 59 Florida State 20 | Oregon -8, 74 | Favorite, Over |
2013 | Michigan State 24 Stanford 20 | Stanford -6.5, 41 | Underdog, Over |
2012 | Stanford 20 Wisconsin 14 | Stanford -4, 46.5 | Favorite, Under |
2011 | Oregon 45 Wisconsin 38 | Oregon -4.5, 74 | Favorite, Over |
2010 | TCU 21 Wisconsin 19 | TCU -3, 54.5 | Underdog, Under |
2009 | Ohio State 26 Oregon 17 | Oregon -4.5, 51 | Underdog, Under |
2008 | USC 38 Penn State 24 | USC -10, 44.5 | Favorite, Over |
2007 | USC 49 Illinois 17 | USC -13.5, 49 | Favorite, Over |
2006 | USC 32 Michigan 18 | Michigan -2, 47.5 | Underdog, Over |
2005 | Texas 41 USC 38 | USC -7, 69.5 | Underdog, Over |
2004 | Texas 38 Michigan 37 | Texas -7, 54 | Underdog, Over |
2003 | USC 28 Michigan 14 | USC -7, 58 | Favorite, Under |
2002 | Oklahoma 34 Washington State 14 | Washington State -5, 53 | Underdog, Under |
2001 | Miami, Fl. 37 Nebraska 14 | Miami -8.5, 54.5 | Favorite, Under |
2000 | Washington 34 Purdue 24 | Purdue -1, 60 | Underdog, Under |
1999 | Wisconsin 17 Stanford 9 | Stanford -11, 58 | Underdog, Under |
1998 | Wisconsin 38 UCLA 31 | UCLA -9, 62 | Underdog, Over |
1997 | Michigan 21 Washington State 16 | Michigan -7, 50 | Underdog, Under |
1996 | Ohio State 20 Arizona State 17 | Ohio State -1.5, 53.5 | Favorite, Under |
1995 | USC 41 Northwestern 32 | USC -3, 41 | Favorite, Over |
1994 | Penn State 38 Oregon 20 | Penn State -17, 57 | Favorite, Over |
1993 | Wisconsin 21 UCLA 16 | UCLA -6.5, 48.5 | Underdog, Under |
1992 | Michigan 38 Washington 31 | Washington -2, 42 | Underdog, Over |
1991 | Washington 34 Michigan 14 | Washington -7, 44.5 | Favorite, Over |
1990 | Washington 46 Iowa 34 | Washington -9.5, 47.5 | Favorite, Over |
1989 | USC 17 Michigan 10 | USC -1.5, 38 | Favorite, Under |
1988 | Michigan 22 USC 14 | USC -6.5, 41 | Underdog, Under |
1987 | Michigan State 20 USC 17 | USC -2.5, 37.5 | Underdog, Under |
1986 | Arizona State 22 Michigan 15 | - | - |
1985 | UCLA 45 Iowa 28 | - | - |
1984 | USC 20 Ohio State 17 | - | - |
1983 | UCLA 45 Illinois 9 | - | - |
1982 | UCLA 24 Michigan 14 | - | - |
1981 | Washington 28 Iowa 0 | - | - |
1980 | Michigan 23 Washington 6 | - | - |
1979 | USC 17 Ohio State 16 | - | - |
1978 | USC 17 Michigan 10 | - | - |
1977 | Washington 27 Michigan 20 | - | - |
1976 | USC 14 Michigan 6 | - | - |
1975 | UCLA 23 Ohio State 10 | - | - |
1974 | USC 18 Ohio State 17 | - | - |
1973 | Ohio State 42 USC 21 | - | - |
1972 | USC 42 Ohio State 17 | - | - |
1971 | Stanford 13 Michigan 12 | - | - |
1970 | Stanford 27 Ohio State 17 | - | - |
1969 | USC 10 Michigan 3 | - | - |
1968 | Ohio State 27 USC 16 | - | - |
1967 | USC 14 Indiana 3 | - | - |
1966 | Purdue 14 USC 13 | - | - |
1965 | UCLA 14 Michigan State 12 | - | - |
1964 | Michigan 34 Oregon State 7 | - | - |
1963 | Illinois 17 Washington 7 | - | - |
1962 | USC 42 Wisconsin 37 | - | - |
1961 | Minnesota 21 UCLA 3 | - | - |
1960 | Washington 17 Minnesota 7 | - | - |
1959 | Washington 44 Wisconsin 8 | - | - |
1958 | Iowa 38 California 12 | - | - |
1957 | Ohio State 10 Oregon 7 | - | - |
1956 | Iowa 35 Oregon State 19 | - | - |
1955 | Michigan State 17 UCLA 14 | - | - |
1954 | Ohio State 20 USC 7 | - | - |
1953 | Michigan State 28 UCLA 20 | - | - |
1952 | USC 7 Wisconsin 0 | - | - |
1951 | Illinois 40 Stanford 7 | - | - |
1950 | Michigan 14 California 6 | - | - |
1949 | Ohio State 17 California 14 | - | - |
1948 | Northwestern 20 California 14 | - | - |
1947 | Michigan 49 USC 0 | - | - |
1946 | Illinois 45 UCLA 14 | - | - |
1945 | Alabama 34 USC 14 | - | - |
1944 | USC 25 Tennessee 0 | - | - |
1943 | USC 29 Washington 0 | - | - |
1942 | Georgia 9 UCLA 0 | - | - |
1941 | Oregon State 20 Duke 16 | - | - |
1940 | Stanford 21 Nebraska 13 | - | - |
1939 | USC 14 Tennessee 0 | - | - |
1938 | USC 7 Duke 3 | - | - |
1937 | California 13 Alabama 0 | - | - |
1936 | Pittsburgh 21 Washington 0 | - | - |
1935 | Stanford 7 SMU 0 | - | - |
1934 | Alabama 29 Stanford 13 | - | - |
1933 | Columbia 7 Stanford 0 | - | - |
1932 | USC 35 Pittsburgh 0 | - | - |
1931 | USC 21 Tulane 12 | - | - |
1930 | Alabama 24 Washington State 0 | - | - |
1929 | USC 47 Pittsburgh 14 | - | - |
1928 | Georgia Tech 8 California 7 | - | - |
1927 | Stanford 7 Pittsburgh 6 | - | - |
1926 | Stanford 7 Alabama 7 | - | - |
1925 | Alabama 20 Washington 19 | - | - |
1924 | Notre Dame 27 Stanford 10 | - | - |
1923 | Washington 14 Navy 14 | - | - |
1922 | USC 14 Penn State 3 | - | - |
1921 | California 0 Wash. & Jeff. 0 | - | - |
1920 | California 28 Ohio State 0 | - | - |
1919 | Harvard 7 Oregon 6 | - | - |
1918 | Great Lakes-US Navy 17 Mare Island 0 | - | - |
1917 | Mare Island-USMC 19 Camp Lewis-US Army 7 | - | - |
1916 | Oregon 14 Pennsylvania 0 | - | - |
1915 | Washington State 14 Brown 0 | - | - |
1902 | Michigan 49 Stanford 0 | - | - |
College Football Bowl Betting Resources
- Odds
- Free Picks
- Premium Picks
- College Playoff Picks
- Futures
- Scores
- Matchups
- ATS Rankings
- News
- Teams
- History
- Bowl Betting Central
- How To Bet on Football
College Football Playoff Odds: Lines, Spreads, Betting Trends for Semifinal Games
College Football Playoff odds for the semifinals are on the board and getting attention, even as debate rages over the four participants. Michigan nabbed the No. 1 ranking and a meeting with No. 4 Alabama in the Rose Bowl on New Year's Day. No. 2 Washington then faces No. 3 Texas in the Sugar Bowl.
Here’s everything you need to know about College Football Playoff odds for the semis: opening lines, spreads and betting trends for each game, as multiple oddsmakers provide insights on CFP odds and action. Check back regularly for updates and use our new ESPN BET bonus code VIBONUS to get the most out of your action.