Sign Up Subscribe
Featured Last Updated Oct 17 2025, 9:00 AM

College Football Week 8 Best Bets: 25 Bets For A Loaded Slate

Dylan Wilkerson
Dylan Wilkerson Sports Betting Expert
College Football Week 8 Best Bets: 25 Bets For A Loaded Slate

Image Credit: Tommy Gilligan-Imagn Images

UPDATE: Through Thursday, college football week 8 best bets are 3-0 with UTEP covering, Jacksonville State winning outright, and Tulsa vs. ECU scored 68 points.

Last week, we went 8-3 in my college football best bets article bringing us to 15-8 in the last 2 weeks. This week we have college football kicking off on Tuesday! For this week's best bets article, we head to Texas, The Carolinas, and beautiful St. Paul Minnesota!

I will be updating this article as more bets get placed, so be sure to check back regularly and add us as a featured source to get the latest sports odds, news, and picks!

Google Preferred Source

First things first: to make the most of college football saturday, you want to make sure you are getting the best line and taking advantage of the best sportsbook promos. Our college football odds page has odds for every game and every major sportsbook. We also have plenty of offers for users to take advantage of, below.

JACKSONVILLE STATE VS. DELAWARE BEST BET

DEL @ JVST Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-2.5 -110 -1 -115 -1.5 -110 -2.5 -110 -1 -115 -3.5 -120 -1.5 -105 -2.5 -115 -1.5 -110 -2.5 -121 -3 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+2.5 -110 +1 -105 +1.5 -110 +2.5 -110 +1 -105 +3.5 -110 +1.5 -115 +2.5 -115 +1.5 -110 +2.5 -104 +3 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
o57.5 -110 o27.5 -125 N/A o28.5 -102 o28 -115 N/A o28.5 +106 o28.5 -115 o27.5 -115 o27.5 -118 o55.5 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
u57.5 -110 u27.5 +105 N/A u28.5 -118 u28 -105 N/A u28.5 -130 u28.5 -115 u27.5 -105 u27.5 -110 u55.5 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-130 -140 -140 -142 -140 -190 -134 N/A N/A -165 -155  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+110 +120 +115 +120 +118 +140 +108 N/A N/A +128 +130  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-2.5 -110 -0.5 even -0.5 +105 -0.5 +105 -0.5 +105 -3.5 -110 -1.5 +124 -0.5 +110 -0.5 +115 -1.5 -103 -3 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -130 +0.5 -135 +0.5 -135 +0.5 -135 +3.5 -120 +1.5 -158 +0.5 -140 +0.5 -155 +1.5 -129 +3 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
o57.5 -110 o13 -110 N/A o10.5 -115 o13 even o13.5 -110 o12.5 -118 o13.5 -105 o13.5 -115 o13.5 -103 o55.5 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
u57.5 -110 u13 -120 N/A u10.5 -115 u13 -130 u13.5 -120 u12.5 -106 u13.5 -125 u13.5 -115 u13.5 -127 u55.5 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-130 -140 -150 -140 -130 -240 -132 N/A N/A -175 -155  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+110 +110 +115 +110 even +170 +106 N/A N/A +132 +130  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 -105 +0.5 -130 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -3 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -115 -0.5 +110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +3 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
o57.5 -110 N/A N/A o26.5 -118 o28.5 even N/A N/A o27.5 -110 N/A N/A o55.5 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
u57.5 -110 N/A N/A u26.5 -102 u28.5 -120 N/A N/A u27.5 -115 N/A N/A u55.5 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-130 N/A N/A -142 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -155  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+110 N/A N/A +120 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +130  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 even N/A N/A -1.5 +116 -0.5 even N/A N/A -3 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -130 N/A N/A +1.5 -154 +0.5 -130 N/A N/A +3 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
o57.5 -110 o16.5 -120 N/A o16.5 -125 N/A N/A o21.5 +106 o15.5 -120 N/A N/A o55.5 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
u57.5 -110 u16.5 -110 N/A u16.5 -105 N/A N/A u21.5 -140 u15.5 -105 N/A N/A u55.5 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-130 -130 N/A -140 N/A N/A -128 N/A N/A N/A -155  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+110 even N/A +110 N/A N/A -100 N/A N/A N/A +130  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +114 N/A N/A -1.5 +120 -0.5 +120 N/A N/A -3 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -145 N/A N/A +1.5 -158 +0.5 -150 N/A N/A +3 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
o57.5 -110 o12.5 -115 N/A o12.5 -115 N/A N/A o12.5 -122 o10.5 -115 N/A N/A o55.5 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
u57.5 -110 u12.5 -115 N/A u12.5 -115 N/A N/A u12.5 -106 u10.5 -110 N/A N/A u55.5 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-130 -130 N/A -135 N/A N/A -140 N/A N/A N/A -155  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+110 even N/A +105 N/A N/A +112 N/A N/A N/A +130  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-2.5 -110 -0.5 +115 N/A -0.5 -115 N/A N/A -1.5 +130 -0.5 +120 N/A N/A -3 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -145 N/A +0.5 -115 N/A N/A +1.5 -174 +0.5 -155 N/A N/A +3 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
o57.5 -110 o14 -115 N/A o14.5 -105 N/A N/A o14.5 +114 o14.5 +105 N/A N/A o55.5 -112  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
u57.5 -110 u14 -115 N/A u14.5 -125 N/A N/A u14.5 -142 u14.5 -135 N/A N/A u55.5 -108  
Final
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 307 Delaware
-130 -125 N/A -160 N/A N/A -122 N/A N/A N/A -155  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 308 Jacksonville State
+110 -105 N/A +124 N/A N/A -104 N/A N/A N/A +130  

Jacksonville State has no reason being an underdog in this matchup. Their defense is average across the board, but their offense is in a great position to take advantage of Delaware's poor defense. Jacksonville State has the 8th-highest EPA/rush, while Delaware's defense is 127th for that metric.

Jacksonville State's path to success in this matchup consists of long, drawn-out drives on the ground. They run 60.2% run plays, so they are more than ready to play to their strengths.

Bet: Jacksonville State Gamecocks +2.5 (-105)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT DraftKings!

UTEP VS. SAM HOUSTON STATE BEST BET

UTEP has one win on the season, and they are favored "on the road" at Sam Houston State? SHSU has had the more difficult schedule by a wide margin, but their metrics are so poor that I am not sure the schedule adjustment even matters.

UTEP's defense should be enough for them to come out victorious. I think it is fair to say that UTEP's offense (which has been inept up until this week) will get something going against this SHSU defense that is 134th against the pass and allowing a 45.8% offensive success rate.

Bet: UTEP Miners -2.5 (-115)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT BetMGM!

Our BetMGM bonus code gives new users a head start on the college football action!

TULSA VS. EAST CAROLINA BEST BET

Although Tulsa's offense is not particularly efficient, both of these teams play at the speed of light. Tulsa is averaging 77.2 offensive snaps per game, while East Carolina is averaging 83.7 offensive snaps per game. I have no doubt that ECU's offense will be able to move the ball against Tulsa; all we need is Tulsa to hold up their end of the bargain just a little bit.

ECUs defense is in the 89th-percentile for Havoc Created; part of this bet is factoring in the potential for ECU defensive scores, which is not out of the cards.

Bet: Tulsa Golden Hurricane @ East Carolina Pirates o55.5 (-105)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT FANDUEL!

Our FanDuel promo code can get you in on the action instantly with a new user bonus!

LOUISVILLE VS. MIAMI FL BEST BET

LOU @ MIA Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+7.5 -110 +7 -110 + +7 -115 + +6.5 even + +7 -120 + +6.5 -105 + +7.5 -128 + +7.5 -125 + +6.5 +110 +7.5 -124 + +11.5 -115  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-7.5 -110 -7 -110 + -7 -105 + -6.5 -120 + -7 even + -6.5 -125 + -7.5 +104 + -7.5 +105 + -6.5 -135 -7.5 even + -11.5 -105  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
o53.5 -110 o25 -110 + N/A o24.5 -110 + o24.5 -110 + N/A o25.5 -102 + o24.5 -110 + o24.5 -110 o26.5 -105 + o49.5 -110  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
u53.5 -110 u25 -110 + N/A u24.5 -110 + u24.5 -110 + N/A u25.5 -120 + u24.5 -110 + u24.5 -110 u26.5 -125 + u49.5 -110  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+470 +320 + +260 + +270 + +270 + +240 + +270 + N/A N/A +265 + +340  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-650 -400 + -325 + -340 + -345 + -350 + -355 + N/A N/A -375 + -440  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+7.5 -110 +5.5 -120 + +3.5 -118 + +3.5 -115 + +5.5 -130 + +3.5 even + +3.5 -128 + +4.5 -120 + +3.5 -110 +3.5 -121 + +11.5 -115  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-7.5 -110 -5.5 even + -3.5 -110 + -3.5 -115 + -5.5 even + -3.5 -130 + -3.5 +102 + -4.5 -110 + -3.5 -125 -3.5 -107 + -11.5 -105  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
o53.5 -110 o10.5 +110 + N/A o10.5 +105 + o10.5 +105 + o10.5 even + o10.5 +118 + o10.5 +110 + o10.5 +105 o11.5 +105 + o49.5 -110  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
u53.5 -110 u10.5 -130 + N/A u10.5 -135 + u10.5 -135 + u10.5 -130 + u10.5 -148 + u10.5 -140 + u10.5 -140 u11.5 -134 + u49.5 -110  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+470 +230 + +210 + +210 + +210 + +210 + +210 + N/A N/A +215 + +340  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-650 -280 + -275 + -280 + -260 + -300 + -280 + N/A N/A -315 + -440  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+7.5 -110 N/A N/A +4.5 -108 + +5.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +11.5 -115  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-7.5 -110 N/A N/A -4.5 -112 + -5.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -11.5 -105  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
o53.5 -110 N/A N/A o23.5 -118 + o23.5 -115 + N/A N/A o23.5 -110 + N/A N/A o49.5 -110  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
u53.5 -110 N/A N/A u23.5 -102 + u23.5 -105 + N/A N/A u23.5 -120 + N/A N/A u49.5 -110  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+470 N/A N/A +205 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +340  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-650 N/A N/A -250 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -440  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+7.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 even + N/A N/A +3.5 -104 + +3.5 -115 + N/A N/A +11.5 -115  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-7.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -130 + N/A N/A -3.5 -128 + -3.5 -115 + N/A N/A -11.5 -105  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
o53.5 -110 o14 -110 + N/A o14.5 +105 + N/A N/A o14.5 +116 + o14.5 +110 + N/A N/A o49.5 -110  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
u53.5 -110 u14 -110 + N/A u14.5 -135 + N/A N/A u14.5 -145 + u14.5 -140 + N/A N/A u49.5 -110  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+470 +175 + N/A +165 + N/A N/A +200 + N/A N/A N/A +340  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-650 -225 + N/A -215 + N/A N/A -265 + N/A N/A N/A -440  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+7.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -110 + N/A N/A +2.5 +102 + +3.5 -130 + N/A N/A +11.5 -115  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-7.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -120 + N/A N/A -2.5 -136 + -3.5 even + N/A N/A -11.5 -105  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
o53.5 -110 o10 -110 + N/A o10.5 +110 + N/A N/A o10.5 +104 + o9.5 -135 + N/A N/A o49.5 -110  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
u53.5 -110 u10 -110 + N/A u10.5 -140 + N/A N/A u10.5 -130 + u9.5 +105 + N/A N/A u49.5 -110  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+470 +195 + N/A +170 + N/A N/A +196 + N/A N/A N/A +340  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-650 -240 + N/A -220 + N/A N/A -260 + N/A N/A N/A -440  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+7.5 -110 +0.5 -110 + N/A +2.5 -115 + N/A N/A +2.5 -102 + +1.5 -115 + N/A N/A +11.5 -115  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-7.5 -110 -0.5 -110 + N/A -2.5 -115 + N/A N/A -2.5 -130 + -1.5 -115 + N/A N/A -11.5 -105  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
o53.5 -110 o12.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 -110 + N/A N/A o12.5 -112 + o13.5 -110 + N/A N/A o49.5 -110  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
u53.5 -110 u12.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -120 + N/A N/A u12.5 -112 + u13.5 -120 + N/A N/A u49.5 -110  
Louisville Cardinals 315 Louisville
+470 +160 + N/A +154 + N/A N/A +180 + N/A N/A N/A +340  
Miami (FL) Hurricanes 316 Miami (FL)
-650 -190 + N/A -200 + N/A N/A -235 + N/A N/A N/A -440  

I have long maintained (since before the season started) that this Miami, FL defense is one of the best in the country. They got a very bad rap last season because of their secondary that could not tackle, but they addressed that in the offseason, and it is looking great. The defensive line is just as strong as it was last season, and the secondary is bolstered.

Louisville's defense has been strong as well. They are allowing the 6th-lowest defensive success rate, and they are FIRST in defensive EPA. Pace is average for these teams, so I think the defenses will reign supreme.

Bet: Louisville Cardinals @ Miami (FL) Hurricanes u52.5 (-108)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT DraftKings!

NEBRASKA VS. MINNESOTA BEST BET

NEB @ MINN Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-5.5 -110 -3.5 -120 + -3.5 -120 + -3.5 -115 + -3.5 -115 + -3.5 -125 + -4.5 -100 + -4.5 -105 + -3.5 -115 -4.5 -107 + -7 -115  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+5.5 -110 +3.5 even + +3.5 even + +3.5 -105 + +3.5 -105 + +3.5 -105 + +4.5 -122 + +4.5 -120 + +3.5 -105 +4.5 -117 + +7 -105  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
o47.5 -118 o23.5 -110 + N/A o23.5 -110 + o23.5 -110 + N/A o24.5 +114 + o23.5 -115 + o23.5 -110 o23.5 -108 + o47.5 -110  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
u47.5 -102 u23.5 -110 + N/A u23.5 -110 + u23.5 -110 + N/A u24.5 -140 + u23.5 -110 + u23.5 -110 u23.5 -121 + u47.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-230 -220 + -225 + -218 + -220 + -240 + -225 + N/A N/A -235 + -278  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+190 +180 + +185 + +180 + +180 + +170 + +184 + N/A N/A +175 + +220  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-5.5 -110 -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -115 + -2.5 -125 + -0.5 -130 + -2.5 -120 + -1.5 -106 + -2.5 -115 + -1.5 -120 -1.5 -106 + -7 -115  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+5.5 -110 +2.5 even + +2.5 -110 + +2.5 -105 + +0.5 even + +2.5 -110 + +1.5 -118 + +2.5 -110 + +1.5 -110 +1.5 -122 + +7 -105  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
o47.5 -118 o10 -105 + N/A o9.5 -125 + o10 even + o9.5 -140 + o9.5 -145 + o9.5 -135 + o10.5 +130 o8.5 -129 + o47.5 -110  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
u47.5 -102 u10 -115 + N/A u9.5 -105 + u10 -130 + u9.5 +110 + u9.5 +118 + u9.5 +105 + u10.5 -180 u8.5 -103 + u47.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-230 -200 + -210 + -200 + -190 + -220 + -194 + N/A N/A -186 + -278  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+190 +165 + +160 + +154 + +155 + +160 + +158 + N/A N/A +143 + +220  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-5.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -115 + -3.5 even + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -7 -115  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+5.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -105 + +3.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +7 -105  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
o47.5 -118 N/A N/A o23.5 -102 + o23.5 -110 + N/A N/A o23.5 -110 + N/A N/A o47.5 -110  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
u47.5 -102 N/A N/A u23.5 -118 + u23.5 -110 + N/A N/A u23.5 -115 + N/A N/A u47.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-230 N/A N/A -218 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -278  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+190 N/A N/A +180 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +220  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-5.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A -2.5 -125 + -2.5 -110 + N/A N/A -7 -115  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+5.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A +2.5 -106 + +2.5 -115 + N/A N/A +7 -105  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
o47.5 -118 o12.5 -125 + N/A o13.5 -105 + N/A N/A o13.5 -112 + o13.5 even + N/A N/A o47.5 -110  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
u47.5 -102 u12.5 -105 + N/A u13.5 -125 + N/A N/A u13.5 -112 + u13.5 -125 + N/A N/A u47.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-230 -200 + N/A -180 + N/A N/A -200 + N/A N/A N/A -278  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+190 +160 + N/A +140 + N/A N/A +152 + N/A N/A N/A +220  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-5.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 -115 + N/A N/A -1.5 -102 + -1.5 -110 + N/A N/A -7 -115  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+5.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -115 + N/A N/A +1.5 -130 + +1.5 -115 + N/A N/A +7 -105  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
o47.5 -118 o10 -110 + N/A o9.5 -140 + N/A N/A o10.5 +116 + o9.5 -140 + N/A N/A o47.5 -110  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
u47.5 -102 u10 -110 + N/A u9.5 +110 + N/A N/A u10.5 -142 + u9.5 +110 + N/A N/A u47.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-230 -200 + N/A -200 + N/A N/A -184 + N/A N/A N/A -278  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+190 +165 + N/A +150 + N/A N/A +138 + N/A N/A N/A +220  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-5.5 -110 -0.5 -105 + N/A -0.5 -125 + N/A N/A -1.5 -104 + -0.5 even + N/A N/A -7 -115  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+5.5 -110 +0.5 -115 + N/A +0.5 -105 + N/A N/A +1.5 -128 + +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A +7 -105  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
o47.5 -118 o10.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 even + N/A N/A o12.5 -114 + o13.5 -105 + N/A N/A o47.5 -110  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
u47.5 -102 u10.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -130 + N/A N/A u12.5 -110 + u13.5 -120 + N/A N/A u47.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 317 Nebraska
-230 -165 + N/A -166 + N/A N/A -178 + N/A N/A N/A -278  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 318 Minnesota
+190 +140 + N/A +130 + N/A N/A +142 + N/A N/A N/A +220  

These teams are pretty evenly matched with regards to their stats. Minnesota has had a slightly tougher schedule according to PFF (40th vs. Nebraska's 79th). Minnesota's defense is strong enough to keep them in this game, and if their offense can play up to their potential, there is no reason Minnesota can't win.

Drake Lindsey has been impressive, while Dylan Raiola has been a tad underwhelming. Minnesota ekes out a win in this Big Ten matchup.

Bet: Minnesota Golden Gophers +9.5 (-110) and ML (+300)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT HARD ROCK!

SAN JOSE STATE VS. UTAH STATE BEST BET

SJSU @ USU Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+3.5 -110 +2.5 even + +2.5 even + +2.5 -102 + +2.5 even + +2.5 even + +3.5 -112 + +2.5 even + +2.5 even +2.5 -108 + +4 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-3.5 -110 -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -118 + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -130 + -3.5 -108 + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -120 -2.5 -115 + -4 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
o63.5 -115 o31 -105 + N/A o30.5 -122 + o31 -105 + N/A o31.5 +110 + o30.5 -125 + o30.5 -125 o30.5 -122 + o61.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
u63.5 -105 u31 -115 + N/A u30.5 +102 + u31 -115 + N/A u31.5 -132 + u30.5 even + u30.5 +105 u30.5 -107 + u61.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+142 +140 + +130 + +130 + +140 + +130 + +152 + N/A N/A +120 + +160  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-170 -165 + -155 + -155 + -165 + -170 + -184 + N/A N/A -157 + -192  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+3.5 -110 +0.5 even + +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -115 + +1.5 -120 + +1.5 -118 + +0.5 -110 + +1.5 -125 +1.5 -125 + +4 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-3.5 -110 -0.5 -120 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -115 + -0.5 -115 + -1.5 -110 + -1.5 -106 + -0.5 -115 + -1.5 -105 -1.5 even + -4 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
o63.5 -115 o13.5 -130 + N/A o13.5 -135 + o13.5 -135 + o13.5 -145 + o13.5 -138 + o13.5 -140 + o14.5 +140 o13.5 -143 + o61.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
u63.5 -105 u13.5 +110 + N/A u13.5 +105 + u13.5 +105 + u13.5 +115 + u13.5 +112 + u13.5 +110 + u14.5 -195 u13.5 +110 + u61.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+142 +130 + +130 + +124 + +130 + +140 + +140 + N/A N/A +125 + +160  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-170 -155 + -165 + -160 + -160 + -190 + -180 + N/A N/A -162 + -192  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+3.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -108 + +1.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +4 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-3.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 -112 + -1.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -4 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
o63.5 -115 N/A N/A o30.5 -110 + o30.5 -105 + N/A N/A o30.5 -115 + N/A N/A o61.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
u63.5 -105 N/A N/A u30.5 -110 + u30.5 -115 + N/A N/A u30.5 -110 + N/A N/A u61.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+142 N/A N/A +124 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +160  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-170 N/A N/A -148 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -192  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+3.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -135 + N/A N/A +1.5 -125 + +0.5 -115 + N/A N/A +4 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-3.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +105 + N/A N/A -1.5 -106 + -0.5 -110 + N/A N/A -4 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
o63.5 -115 o17 -105 + N/A o16.5 -135 + N/A N/A o17.5 +106 + o16.5 -130 + N/A N/A o61.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
u63.5 -105 u17 -115 + N/A u16.5 +105 + N/A N/A u17.5 -130 + u16.5 +105 + N/A N/A u61.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+142 +120 + N/A -105 + N/A N/A +124 + N/A N/A N/A +160  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-170 -140 + N/A -125 + N/A N/A -158 + N/A N/A N/A -192  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+3.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A +1.5 -174 + +0.5 -130 + N/A N/A +4 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-3.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A -1.5 +132 + -0.5 even + N/A N/A -4 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
o63.5 -115 o14 -110 + N/A o13.5 -145 + N/A N/A o13.5 -140 + o13.5 -140 + N/A N/A o61.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
u63.5 -105 u14 -110 + N/A u13.5 +114 + N/A N/A u13.5 +112 + u13.5 +110 + N/A N/A u61.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+142 +110 + N/A +114 + N/A N/A -104 + N/A N/A N/A +160  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-170 -130 + N/A -145 + N/A N/A -122 + N/A N/A N/A -192  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+3.5 -110 +0.5 -140 + N/A +0.5 -130 + N/A N/A +1.5 -158 + +0.5 -140 + N/A N/A +4 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-3.5 -110 -0.5 +120 + N/A -0.5 even + N/A N/A -1.5 +116 + -0.5 +110 + N/A N/A -4 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
o63.5 -115 o16.5 -110 + N/A o15.5 -120 + N/A N/A o14.5 -110 + o15.5 -115 + N/A N/A o61.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
u63.5 -105 u16.5 -110 + N/A u15.5 -110 + N/A N/A u14.5 -114 + u15.5 -110 + N/A N/A u61.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 319 San Jose State
+142 +105 + N/A -105 + N/A N/A +108 + N/A N/A N/A +160  
Utah State Aggies 320 Utah State
-170 -125 + N/A -125 + N/A N/A -138 + N/A N/A N/A -192  

This total seems to be too high given the pace at which these teams play. SJSU averages 72.8 offensive snaps per game, and Utah State is averaging 69.2 offensive snaps per game. The offenses are average at best, and I don't expect many explosive plays from either team. I think 64.5 is too many points for this Mountain West matchup.

Bet: San Jose State Spartans @ Utah State Aggies u64.5 (-105)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT DraftKings!

LSU VS. VANDERBILT BEST BET

LSU @ VAN Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-3.5 -110 +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -112 + +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -125 + +1.5 -134 + +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -120 +1.5 -121 + +1.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -108 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -105 + -1.5 +110 + -0.5 even + -0.5 even -1.5 -103 + -1.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
o49.5 -105 o23.5 -115 + N/A o23.5 -110 + o23.5 -115 + N/A o24.5 +112 + o23.5 -115 + o23.5 -115 o23.5 -115 + o48.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
u49.5 -115 u23.5 -105 + N/A u23.5 -110 + u23.5 -105 + N/A u24.5 -138 + u23.5 -105 + u23.5 -105 u23.5 -120 + u48.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-102 even + even + +105 + even + -105 + -102 + N/A N/A even + +102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
-118 -120 + -120 + -125 + -120 + -125 + -120 + N/A N/A -129 + -122  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-3.5 -110 +0.5 -135 + +0.5 -150 + +0.5 -140 + +0.5 -140 + +0.5 -150 + +1.5 -180 + +0.5 -150 + -0.5 +155 +1.5 -175 + +1.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 -0.5 +115 + -0.5 +118 + -0.5 +110 + -0.5 +110 + -0.5 +120 + -1.5 +142 + -0.5 +115 + +0.5 -220 -1.5 +133 + -1.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
o49.5 -105 o10.5 +105 + N/A o10.5 +105 + o10 -125 + o10.5 +110 + o9.5 -150 + o10.5 +105 + o10.5 +110 o9.5 -127 + o48.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
u49.5 -115 u10.5 -135 + N/A u10.5 -135 + u10 -105 + u10.5 -140 + u9.5 +118 + u10.5 -135 + u10.5 -150 u9.5 -104 + u48.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-102 even + +105 + +105 + even + -110 + -113 + N/A N/A -106 + +102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
-118 -120 + -135 + -135 + -130 + -120 + -113 + N/A N/A -124 + -122  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-3.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -142 + -0.5 +105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +120 + +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
o49.5 -105 N/A N/A o24.5 +102 + o23.5 -125 + N/A N/A o23.5 -130 + N/A N/A o48.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
u49.5 -115 N/A N/A u24.5 -122 + u23.5 +105 + N/A N/A u23.5 even + N/A N/A u48.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-102 N/A N/A -112 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
-118 N/A N/A -108 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -122  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-3.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A +1.5 -158 + +0.5 -160 + N/A N/A +1.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -1.5 +118 + -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -1.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
o49.5 -105 o14 -110 + N/A o12.5 -125 + N/A N/A o13.5 -122 + o13.5 -110 + N/A N/A o48.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
u49.5 -115 u14 -110 + N/A u12.5 -105 + N/A N/A u13.5 -102 + u13.5 -120 + N/A N/A u48.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-102 -105 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -104 + N/A N/A N/A +102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
-118 -115 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -122 + N/A N/A N/A -122  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-3.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +130 + N/A N/A +1.5 -180 + -0.5 +140 + N/A N/A +1.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -166 + N/A N/A -1.5 +130 + +0.5 -180 + N/A N/A -1.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
o49.5 -105 o10 -110 + N/A o9.5 -140 + N/A N/A o9.5 -150 + o9.5 -125 + N/A N/A o48.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
u49.5 -115 u10 -110 + N/A u9.5 +110 + N/A N/A u9.5 +120 + u9.5 -105 + N/A N/A u48.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-102 -105 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -100 + N/A N/A N/A +102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
-118 -115 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -128 + N/A N/A N/A -122  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-3.5 -110 +0.5 -165 + N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -178 + -0.5 +130 + N/A N/A +1.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 -0.5 +145 + N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +128 + +0.5 -170 + N/A N/A -1.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
o49.5 -105 o13.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 -130 + N/A N/A o12.5 -120 + o13.5 -140 + N/A N/A o48.5 -105  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
u49.5 -115 u13.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 even + N/A N/A u12.5 -104 + u13.5 +110 + N/A N/A u48.5 -115  
LSU Tigers 365 LSU
-102 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -106 + N/A N/A N/A +102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 366 Vanderbilt
-118 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -120 + N/A N/A N/A -122  

While LSU's offense is having its offensive struggles, their defense has been extremely strong. This combination has led LSU to a 5-1 record to the under. Neither team is in a rush to get plays off, and even Vanderbilt's defense has flashed some promise. I am going to bet on LSU to continue their defensive dominance and offensive ineptitude.

LSU vs. Vanderbilt Best Bet: LSU Tigers @ Vanderbilt Commodores u49.5 (-112)

Check out our complete LSU vs. Vanderbilt Prediction.


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT bet365!

New to sports betting? Check out our bet365 bonus code to get in on the action today!

ARIZONA VS. HOUSTON BEST BET

ARI @ HOU Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+2.5 -110 -0.5 +110 + +0.5 -130 + -0.5 +105 + -0.5 +105 + -0.5 even + -1.5 +112 + -0.5 +105 + -0.5 +105 +1.5 -139 + -1.5 -105  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-2.5 -110 +0.5 -130 + -0.5 +105 + +0.5 -125 + +0.5 -125 + +0.5 -130 + +1.5 -142 + +0.5 -130 + +0.5 -125 -1.5 +112 + +1.5 -115  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
o47.5 -110 o23.5 -105 + N/A o23.5 -105 + o23.5 -105 + N/A o23.5 -110 + o23.5 -110 + o23.5 -105 o23.5 -125 + o47.5 -110  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
u47.5 -110 u23.5 -115 + N/A u23.5 -115 + u23.5 -115 + N/A u23.5 -110 + u23.5 -115 + u23.5 -115 u23.5 -104 + u47.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+105 -110 + -110 + -108 + -110 + -120 + -114 + N/A N/A -113 + -112  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-125 -110 + -110 + -112 + -110 + -110 + -106 + N/A N/A -115 + -108  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+2.5 -110 -0.5 +125 + +0.5 -175 + -0.5 +124 + -0.5 +130 + -0.5 +120 + -1.5 +136 + -0.5 +120 + -0.5 +125 +1.5 -175 + -1.5 -105  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-2.5 -110 +0.5 -155 + -0.5 +135 + +0.5 -160 + +0.5 -160 + +0.5 -150 + +1.5 -174 + +0.5 -155 + +0.5 -170 -1.5 +130 + +1.5 -115  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
o47.5 -110 o9.5 -125 + N/A o9.5 -130 + o9.5 -130 + o9.5 -160 + o9.5 -135 + o9.5 -135 + o10.5 +120 o10.5 -106 + o47.5 -110  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
u47.5 -110 u9.5 -105 + N/A u9.5 even + u9.5 even + u9.5 +125 + u9.5 +106 + u9.5 +105 + u10.5 -165 u10.5 -124 + u47.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+105 -115 + -115 + -125 + -125 + -125 + -120 + N/A N/A -120 + -112  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-125 -115 + -110 + -105 + -105 + -105 + -106 + N/A N/A -110 + -108  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +120 + -0.5 even + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -105  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -142 + +0.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -115  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
o47.5 -110 N/A N/A o24.5 +102 + o23.5 -115 + N/A N/A o23.5 -115 + N/A N/A o47.5 -110  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
u47.5 -110 N/A N/A u24.5 -122 + u23.5 -105 + N/A N/A u23.5 -110 + N/A N/A u47.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+105 N/A N/A -112 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -112  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-125 N/A N/A -108 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -108  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A +1.5 -166 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -105  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A -1.5 +124 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -115  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
o47.5 -110 o13 -110 + N/A o12.5 -115 + N/A N/A o13.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A o47.5 -110  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
u47.5 -110 u13 -110 + N/A u12.5 -115 + N/A N/A u13.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A u47.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+105 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -111 + N/A N/A N/A -112  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-125 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -115 + N/A N/A N/A -108  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +124 + N/A N/A -1.5 +138 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -105  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -160 + N/A N/A +1.5 -188 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -115  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
o47.5 -110 o10.5 -105 + N/A o10.5 +105 + N/A N/A o9.5 -145 + N/A N/A N/A o47.5 -110  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
u47.5 -110 u10.5 -115 + N/A u10.5 -135 + N/A N/A u9.5 +116 + N/A N/A N/A u47.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+105 -110 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -118 + N/A N/A N/A -112  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-125 -110 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -108 + N/A N/A N/A -108  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+2.5 -110 -0.5 +140 + N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +134 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -105  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-2.5 -110 +0.5 -165 + N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -182 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -115  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
o47.5 -110 o13.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 -125 + N/A N/A o11.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A o47.5 -110  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
u47.5 -110 u13.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -105 + N/A N/A u11.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A u47.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 383 Arizona
+105 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -118 + N/A N/A N/A -112  
Houston Cougars 384 Houston
-125 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -108 + N/A N/A N/A -108  

I simply don't see a world in which Houston scores enough to push this number. Their offense is 128th in EPA/rush and 99th in EPA/pass on offense. Arizona's defense is no joke, allowing a mere 34.2% success rate.

Alternatively, Houston's defense is stout. They are very effective against the pass, and they are specifically effective on early downs. Houston's skill set dictates this game, and that means we are in for a low-scoring affair.

Arizona vs. Houston Best Bet: Arizona Wildcats @ Houston Cougars u46.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT BetMGM!

CENTRAL MICHIGAN VS. BOWLING GREEN BEST BET

Both of these teams are averaging under 70 offensive snaps per game, with BGSU averaging 65.8. BGSU's offense is one of the worst in college football, ranking 118th in EPA/pass and 104th in EPA/rush. All things considered, the Falcons defense is rather strong. They are 40th in late-down success allowed and 42nd in average 3rd-down distance allowed.

The lack of offensive success for BGSU and their defensive potential make the under a play for me in this MAC matchup.

Central Michigan vs. Bowling Green Best Bet: Central Michigan Chippewas @ Bowling Green Falcons u43.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT FANDUEL!

DUKE VS. VIRGINIA TECH BEST BET

GT @ DUKE Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-1.5 -110 +1 -105 + +0.5 -110 + +1.5 -112 + +1 -110 + +1.5 -120 + +1.5 -115 + +0.5 -105 + +1.5 -110 +1.5 -115 + +2.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
+1.5 -110 -1 -115 + -0.5 -110 + -1.5 -108 + -1 -110 + -1.5 -110 + -1.5 -105 + -0.5 -115 + -1.5 -110 -1.5 -108 + -2.5 -115  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
o60.5 -105 o29.5 -115 + N/A o30.5 -105 + o29.5 -120 + N/A o30.5 -110 + o29.5 -115 + o29.5 -115 o28.5 -114 + o60.5 -108  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
u60.5 -115 u29.5 -105 + N/A u30.5 -115 + u29.5 even + N/A u30.5 -110 + u29.5 -105 + u29.5 -105 u28.5 -114 + u60.5 -112  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-102 +115 + +110 + +114 + +110 + +110 + +110 + N/A N/A +107 + +120  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
-118 -135 + -135 + -135 + -130 + -140 + -134 + N/A N/A -139 + -142  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-1.5 -110 +0.5 -140 + +0.5 -140 + +0.5 -135 + +0.5 -140 + +0.5 -130 + +1.5 -152 + +0.5 -140 + -0.5 +155 +1.5 -162 + +2.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
+1.5 -110 -0.5 +110 + -0.5 +105 + -0.5 +105 + -0.5 +110 + -0.5 even + -1.5 +122 + -0.5 +110 + +0.5 -220 -1.5 +125 + -2.5 -115  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
o60.5 -105 o13.5 -105 + N/A o12.5 -120 + o13.5 -105 + o13.5 -110 + o13.5 -122 + o13.5 -115 + o13.5 -105 o12.5 -124 + o60.5 -108  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
u60.5 -115 u13.5 -115 + N/A u12.5 -110 + u13.5 -125 + u13.5 -120 + u13.5 -102 + u13.5 -115 + u13.5 -125 u12.5 -106 + u60.5 -112  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-102 +105 + +105 + +105 + +105 + +110 + +106 + N/A N/A even + +120  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
-118 -135 + -140 + -135 + -135 + -140 + -136 + N/A N/A -130 + -142  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -135 + -0.5 +105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +114 + +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -115  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
o60.5 -105 N/A N/A o29.5 -115 + o29.5 -115 + N/A N/A o30.5 -115 + N/A N/A o60.5 -108  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
u60.5 -115 N/A N/A u29.5 -105 + u29.5 -105 + N/A N/A u30.5 -115 + N/A N/A u60.5 -112  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-102 N/A N/A -102 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +120  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
-118 N/A N/A -118 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -142  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -140 + N/A N/A +1.5 -146 + +0.5 -130 + N/A N/A +2.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +110 + N/A N/A -1.5 +110 + -0.5 even + N/A N/A -2.5 -115  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
o60.5 -105 o17 -110 + N/A o17.5 +110 + N/A N/A o17.5 +120 + o16.5 -130 + N/A N/A o60.5 -108  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
u60.5 -115 u17 -110 + N/A u17.5 -140 + N/A N/A u17.5 -150 + u16.5 even + N/A N/A u60.5 -112  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-102 -105 + N/A -105 + N/A N/A -100 + N/A N/A N/A +120  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
-118 -115 + N/A -125 + N/A N/A -128 + N/A N/A N/A -142  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A +1.5 -166 + +0.5 -160 + N/A N/A +2.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -1.5 +124 + -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -2.5 -115  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
o60.5 -105 o14 even + N/A o13.5 -120 + N/A N/A o13.5 -124 + o13.5 -125 + N/A N/A o60.5 -108  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
u60.5 -115 u14 -120 + N/A u13.5 -110 + N/A N/A u13.5 -100 + u13.5 -105 + N/A N/A u60.5 -112  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-102 -105 + N/A -105 + N/A N/A +104 + N/A N/A N/A +120  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
-118 -115 + N/A -125 + N/A N/A -132 + N/A N/A N/A -142  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-1.5 -110 +0.5 -140 + N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -180 + +0.5 -160 + N/A N/A +2.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
+1.5 -110 -0.5 +120 + N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +130 + -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -2.5 -115  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
o60.5 -105 o16.5 -115 + N/A o16.5 -110 + N/A N/A o14.5 -108 + o16.5 -120 + N/A N/A o60.5 -108  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
u60.5 -115 u16.5 -105 + N/A u16.5 -120 + N/A N/A u14.5 -116 + u16.5 -110 + N/A N/A u60.5 -112  
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 349 Georgia Tech
-102 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -104 + N/A N/A N/A +120  
Duke Blue Devils 350 Duke
-118 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -122 + N/A N/A N/A -142  

This is far and away my favorite pick of the week. This Duke team has suffered two losses coming back to back to Illinois and Tulane near the front end of the season. Duke's offense is very strong, and they are poised to take care of a Georgia Tech defense that has allowed 20+ points 5 times this season to much worse teams. There is no telling how many points Duke is going to put up.

While Duke's defense is not their strongest unit, they are strong enough to get Georgia Tech's offense off of the field in a quick manner to let Darian Mensah and this Blue Devils offense do their thing to the Yellow Jackets.

Duke vs. Virginia Tech Best Bet: Duke Blue Devils -1.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT FANDUEL!

WEST VIRGINIA VS. UCF BEST BET

WVU @ UCF Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+9.5 -110 +4 even + +4.5 -115 + +4.5 -112 + +4.5 -114 + +4.5 -125 + +4.5 -115 + +4.5 -115 + +4.5 -115 +4.5 -118 + +7.5 -110  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-9.5 -110 -4 -120 + -4.5 -105 + -4.5 -108 + -4.5 -108 + -4.5 -105 + -4.5 -105 + -4.5 -110 + -4.5 -105 -4.5 -106 + -7.5 -110  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
o48.5 -115 o23.5 -110 + N/A o23.5 -110 + o23.5 -109 + N/A o23.5 -108 + o23.5 -110 + o23.5 -110 o23.5 -107 + o46.5 -115  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
u48.5 -105 u23.5 -110 + N/A u23.5 -110 + u23.5 -114 + N/A u23.5 -112 + u23.5 -115 + u23.5 -110 u23.5 -122 + u46.5 -105  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+225 +205 + +220 + +215 + +195 + +200 + +184 + N/A N/A +185 + +235  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-278 -240 + -275 + -265 + -240 + -280 + -240 + N/A N/A -250 + -290  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+9.5 -110 +2.5 -110 + +2.5 even + +2.5 even + N/A N/A +1.5 -112 + +2.5 -105 + +1.5 even +2.5 -117 + +7.5 -110  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-9.5 -110 -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -135 + -2.5 -130 + N/A N/A -1.5 -112 + -2.5 -120 + -1.5 -135 -2.5 -112 + -7.5 -110  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
o48.5 -115 o10 -110 + N/A o9.5 -140 + N/A N/A o9.5 -122 + o9.5 -135 + o10.5 +120 o10.5 +116 + o46.5 -115  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
u48.5 -105 u10 -110 + N/A u9.5 +110 + N/A N/A u9.5 -102 + u9.5 +105 + u10.5 -165 u10.5 -152 + u46.5 -105  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+225 +170 + +185 + +170 + +170 + N/A +164 + N/A N/A +163 + +235  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-278 -220 + -250 + -220 + -210 + N/A -215 + N/A N/A -225 + -290  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -115 + +3.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +7.5 -110  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -105 + -3.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -7.5 -110  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
o48.5 -115 N/A N/A o23.5 -105 + o23.5 -110 + N/A N/A o22.5 -115 + N/A N/A o46.5 -115  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
u48.5 -105 N/A N/A u23.5 -115 + u23.5 -110 + N/A N/A u22.5 -110 + N/A N/A u46.5 -105  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+225 N/A N/A +160 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +235  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-278 N/A N/A -198 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -290  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -115 + N/A N/A +2.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A +7.5 -110  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -115 + N/A N/A -2.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A -7.5 -110  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
o48.5 -115 o12.5 -125 + N/A o12.5 -135 + N/A N/A o13.5 -116 + N/A N/A N/A o46.5 -115  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
u48.5 -105 u12.5 -105 + N/A u12.5 +105 + N/A N/A u13.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A u46.5 -105  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+225 +140 + N/A +145 + N/A N/A +164 + N/A N/A N/A +235  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-278 -170 + N/A -188 + N/A N/A -215 + N/A N/A N/A -290  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -110 + N/A N/A +1.5 -122 + N/A N/A N/A +7.5 -110  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -120 + N/A N/A -1.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A -7.5 -110  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
o48.5 -115 o9.5 -115 + N/A o9.5 -140 + N/A N/A o9.5 -138 + N/A N/A N/A o46.5 -115  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
u48.5 -105 u9.5 -105 + N/A u9.5 +110 + N/A N/A u9.5 +110 + N/A N/A N/A u46.5 -105  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+225 +170 + N/A +140 + N/A N/A +150 + N/A N/A N/A +235  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-278 -200 + N/A -180 + N/A N/A -200 + N/A N/A N/A -290  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+9.5 -110 +0.5 -125 + N/A +0.5 -110 + N/A N/A +1.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A +7.5 -110  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-9.5 -110 -0.5 +105 + N/A -0.5 -120 + N/A N/A -1.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A -7.5 -110  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
o48.5 -115 o10.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 even + N/A N/A o12.5 -116 + N/A N/A N/A o46.5 -115  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
u48.5 -105 u10.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -130 + N/A N/A u12.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A u46.5 -105  
West Virginia Mountaineers 327 West Virginia
+225 +145 + N/A +130 + N/A N/A +136 + N/A N/A N/A +235  
UCF Knights 328 UCF
-278 -170 + N/A -166 + N/A N/A -174 + N/A N/A N/A -290  

The Mountaineers get to catch a sliding UCF team off of the back of 3 straight losses to Kansas State, Kansas, and Cincinnati. West Virginia is in the middle of a similar skid, but their competition has been tougher in Kansas, Utah, and BYU. WVU's schedule to date has been tougher than UCF's according to PFF, as they have played the 18th-toughest schedule while UCF has played the 88th.

West Virginia boasts the 37th-ranked defensive success rate while being particularly strong against the rush. UCF's offensive strength is their rush attack, which West Virginia is primed to resist.

West Virginia vs. UCF Best Bet: West Virginia Mountaineers +7.5 (-115) + ML (+250)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT HARD ROCK!

OLD DOMINION VS. JAMES MADISON BEST BET

ODU @ JMU Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+1.5 -110 +1 -125 + +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -115 + +1.5 -128 + +0.5 -120 + +1.5 -125 +1.5 -122 + +2.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-1.5 -110 -1 +105 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -115 + -1.5 +104 + -0.5 -110 + -1.5 +105 -1.5 -103 + -2.5 -110  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
o47.5 -110 o23 -115 + N/A o23.5 -110 + o23.5 -110 + N/A o23.5 -114 + o23.5 -110 + o23.5 -105 o23.5 -117 + o47.5 -112  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
u47.5 -110 u23 -105 + N/A u23.5 -110 + u23.5 -110 + N/A u23.5 -106 + u23.5 -115 + u23.5 -115 u23.5 -110 + u47.5 -108  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+110 +105 + +105 + +105 + +105 + even + +104 + N/A N/A +102 + +114  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-130 -125 + -125 + -125 + -125 + -130 + -128 + N/A N/A -134 + -135  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -130 + +0.5 -155 + +0.5 -154 + +0.5 -135 + +0.5 -140 + +1.5 -168 + +0.5 -150 + -0.5 +155 +1.5 -162 + +2.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-1.5 -110 -0.5 +110 + -0.5 +120 + -0.5 +120 + -0.5 +105 + -0.5 +110 + -1.5 +134 + -0.5 +120 + +0.5 -220 -1.5 +125 + -2.5 -110  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
o47.5 -110 o10.5 +115 + N/A o9.5 -125 + o10 -105 + o9.5 -135 + o9.5 -135 + o9.5 -125 + o10.5 +130 o9.5 -139 + o47.5 -112  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
u47.5 -110 u10.5 -135 + N/A u9.5 -105 + u10 -125 + u9.5 +105 + u9.5 +108 + u9.5 -105 + u10.5 -180 u9.5 +107 + u47.5 -108  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+110 +105 + even + even + even + +105 + -100 + N/A N/A -103 + +114  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-130 -125 + -135 + -130 + -130 + -135 + -128 + N/A N/A -129 + -135  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -135 + +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +114 + -0.5 +105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -110  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
o47.5 -110 N/A N/A o23.5 -120 + o23.5 -110 + N/A N/A o23.5 -120 + N/A N/A o47.5 -112  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
u47.5 -110 N/A N/A u23.5 even + u23.5 -110 + N/A N/A u23.5 -105 + N/A N/A u47.5 -108  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+110 N/A N/A -102 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +114  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-130 N/A N/A -118 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -135  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -160 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +120 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -110  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
o47.5 -110 o13.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 even + N/A N/A o13.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A o47.5 -112  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
u47.5 -110 u13.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -130 + N/A N/A u13.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A u47.5 -108  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+110 -105 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -104 + N/A N/A N/A +114  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-130 -115 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -122 + N/A N/A N/A -135  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -166 + N/A N/A +1.5 -192 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +130 + N/A N/A -1.5 +142 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -110  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
o47.5 -110 o10 -115 + N/A o9.5 -145 + N/A N/A o9.5 -135 + N/A N/A N/A o47.5 -112  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
u47.5 -110 u10 -105 + N/A u9.5 +114 + N/A N/A u9.5 +108 + N/A N/A N/A u47.5 -108  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+110 -110 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -108 + N/A N/A N/A +114  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-130 -110 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -118 + N/A N/A N/A -135  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -160 + N/A +0.5 -140 + N/A N/A +1.5 -182 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-1.5 -110 -0.5 +135 + N/A -0.5 +110 + N/A N/A -1.5 +136 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -110  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
o47.5 -110 o13 -110 + N/A o13.5 -115 + N/A N/A o12.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A o47.5 -112  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
u47.5 -110 u13 -110 + N/A u13.5 -115 + N/A N/A u12.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A u47.5 -108  
Old Dominion Monarchs 335 Old Dominion
+110 -110 + N/A -105 + N/A N/A -108 + N/A N/A N/A +114  
James Madison Dukes 336 James Madison
-130 -110 + N/A -125 + N/A N/A -120 + N/A N/A N/A -135  

Old Dominion's explosiveness on offense gives them the advantage in this matchup. They have a big-time throw rate of 7.45%, one of the highest in the league. Their ability to create big plays complements their 46.2% offensive success rate. ODU's 87th-rated strength of schedule played outpaces JMU's 119th, and ODU's 0.21 EPA/play suggests that their offensive success can will them to a win.

Old Dominion vs. James Madison Best Bet: Old Dominion Monarchs +2.5 (-115)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT bet365!

UTSA VS. NORTH TEXAS BEST BET

UTSA @ UNT Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+6.5 -110 +2.5 even + +2.5 -102 + +2.5 -102 + +2.5 even + N/A +3.5 -122 + +2.5 -105 + +2.5 -105 +2.5 -107 + +3.5 -108  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-6.5 -110 -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -118 + -2.5 -118 + -2.5 -120 + N/A -3.5 -100 + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -115 -2.5 -117 + -3.5 -112  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
o67.5 -112 o33.5 -105 + N/A o33.5 -112 + o33.5 -110 + N/A o34.5 +104 + o32.5 -120 + o33.5 -110 o33.5 -106 + o65.5 -110  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
u67.5 -108 u33.5 -115 + N/A u33.5 -108 + u33.5 -110 + N/A u34.5 -130 + u32.5 -110 + u33.5 -110 u33.5 -122 + u65.5 -110  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+160 +130 + +125 + +130 + +135 + N/A +140 + N/A N/A +118 + +150  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-192 -155 + -155 + -155 + -160 + N/A -172 + N/A N/A -155 + -180  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+6.5 -110 +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -118 + +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -115 + N/A +1.5 -128 + +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -120 +2.5 -127 + +3.5 -108  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-6.5 -110 -0.5 -115 + -0.5 -110 + -0.5 -115 + -0.5 -115 + N/A -1.5 +102 + -0.5 -110 + -0.5 -110 -2.5 -103 + -3.5 -112  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
o67.5 -112 o14 -110 + N/A o14.5 +114 + o14.5 +110 + o14.5 even + o14.5 +124 + o14.5 even + o14.5 even o14.5 +112 + o65.5 -110  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
u67.5 -108 u14 -120 + N/A u14.5 -145 + u14.5 -140 + u14.5 -130 + u14.5 -156 + u14.5 -130 + u14.5 -135 u14.5 -143 + u65.5 -110  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+160 +130 + +130 + +124 + +130 + N/A +142 + N/A N/A +130 + +150  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-192 -160 + -165 + -160 + -160 + N/A -184 + N/A N/A -167 + -180  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -110 + +0.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +3.5 -108  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 -110 + -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -3.5 -112  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
o67.5 -112 N/A N/A o31.5 -108 + o32.5 -110 + N/A N/A o33.5 -110 + N/A N/A o65.5 -110  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
u67.5 -108 N/A N/A u31.5 -112 + u32.5 -110 + N/A N/A u33.5 -115 + N/A N/A u65.5 -110  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+160 N/A N/A +124 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +150  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-192 N/A N/A -148 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -180  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -135 + N/A N/A +1.5 -132 + N/A N/A N/A +3.5 -108  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +105 + N/A N/A -1.5 -100 + N/A N/A N/A -3.5 -112  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
o67.5 -112 o17.5 -105 + N/A o17.5 +105 + N/A N/A o20.5 +106 + N/A N/A N/A o65.5 -110  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
u67.5 -108 u17.5 -115 + N/A u17.5 -135 + N/A N/A u20.5 -132 + N/A N/A N/A u65.5 -110  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+160 +120 + N/A +105 + N/A N/A +120 + N/A N/A N/A +150  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-192 -140 + N/A -135 + N/A N/A -150 + N/A N/A N/A -180  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -130 + N/A N/A +1.5 -180 + N/A N/A N/A +3.5 -108  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 even + N/A N/A -1.5 +134 + N/A N/A N/A -3.5 -112  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
o67.5 -112 o14 -115 + N/A o14.5 +140 + N/A N/A o13.5 -166 + N/A N/A N/A o65.5 -110  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
u67.5 -108 u14 -105 + N/A u14.5 -180 + N/A N/A u13.5 +132 + N/A N/A N/A u65.5 -110  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+160 +110 + N/A +114 + N/A N/A -100 + N/A N/A N/A +150  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-192 -130 + N/A -145 + N/A N/A -128 + N/A N/A N/A -180  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+6.5 -110 +0.5 -125 + N/A +0.5 -130 + N/A N/A +1.5 -158 + N/A N/A N/A +3.5 -108  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-6.5 -110 -0.5 +105 + N/A -0.5 even + N/A N/A -1.5 +122 + N/A N/A N/A -3.5 -112  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
o67.5 -112 o17.5 -110 + N/A o16.5 -125 + N/A N/A o16.5 -124 + N/A N/A N/A o65.5 -110  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
u67.5 -108 u17.5 -110 + N/A u16.5 -105 + N/A N/A u16.5 -100 + N/A N/A N/A u65.5 -110  
UTSA Roadrunners 379 UTSA
+160 +105 + N/A even + N/A N/A +106 + N/A N/A N/A +150  
North Texas Mean Green 380 North Texas
-192 -125 + N/A -130 + N/A N/A -136 + N/A N/A N/A -180  

I love how UTSA's defense matches up against North Texas. UNT has one of the strongest offensive units in all of college football in my opinion, but UTSA defends extremely well against the rush, something UNT does very well.

We also saw UNT's defense get completely exposed by South Florida this past weekend. The blueprint is out there, and I expect UTSA's offense to exploit some of the Mean Green's defensive weaknesses.

UTSA vs. North Texas Best Bet: UTSA Roadrunners +4.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT FANDUEL!

OLE MISS VS. GEORGIA BEST BET

MISS @ UGA Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+9.5 -110 +3.5 -105 + +3.5 -102 + +3.5 even + +3.5 -105 + +3.5 -110 + +3.5 -115 + +3.5 even + +3.5 -105 +3.5 -107 + +7 -108  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-9.5 -110 -3.5 -115 + -3.5 -118 + -3.5 -120 + -3.5 -115 + -3.5 -120 + -3.5 -105 + -3.5 -120 + -3.5 -115 -3.5 -120 + -7 -112  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
o53.5 -110 o27.5 -120 + N/A o27.5 -108 + o27.5 -115 + N/A o28.5 -100 + o27.5 -115 + o27.5 -115 o27.5 -121 + o56.5 -112  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
u53.5 -110 u27.5 even + N/A u27.5 -112 + u27.5 -105 + N/A u28.5 -124 + u27.5 -105 + u27.5 -105 u27.5 -107 + u56.5 -108  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+270 +180 + +165 + +170 + +175 + +170 + +146 + N/A N/A +160 + +220  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-340 -220 + -200 + -205 + -210 + -240 + -180 + N/A N/A -215 + -285  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+9.5 -110 +3 -125 + +2.5 -105 + +2.5 -105 + +2.5 -105 + +2.5 -110 + +1.5 -128 + +2.5 -115 + +2.5 -105 +1.5 -124 + +7 -108  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-9.5 -110 -3 -105 + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -125 + -2.5 -125 + -2.5 -120 + -1.5 +102 + -2.5 -115 + -2.5 -125 -1.5 -106 + -7 -112  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
o53.5 -110 o10.5 -115 + N/A o12.5 -120 + o12.5 -125 + o13.5 -110 + o12.5 -118 + o12.5 -120 + o13.5 -110 o12.5 -114 + o56.5 -112  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
u53.5 -110 u10.5 -115 + N/A u12.5 -110 + u12.5 -105 + u13.5 -120 + u12.5 -106 + u12.5 -110 + u13.5 -120 u12.5 -114 + u56.5 -108  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+270 +155 + +160 + +150 + +155 + +150 + +120 + N/A N/A +138 + +220  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-340 -190 + -210 + -195 + -190 + -200 + -154 + N/A N/A -182 + -285  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -102 + +3.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +7 -108  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -118 + -3.5 even + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -7 -112  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
o53.5 -110 N/A N/A o28.5 -105 + o27.5 -115 + N/A N/A o27.5 -125 + N/A N/A o56.5 -112  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
u53.5 -110 N/A N/A u28.5 -115 + u27.5 -105 + N/A N/A u27.5 -105 + N/A N/A u56.5 -108  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+270 N/A N/A +170 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +220  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-340 N/A N/A -205 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -285  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -115 + N/A N/A +2.5 -110 + +2.5 -115 + N/A N/A +7 -108  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -115 + N/A N/A -2.5 -122 + -2.5 -115 + N/A N/A -7 -112  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
o53.5 -110 o16.5 -110 + N/A o15.5 -120 + N/A N/A o16.5 -120 + o15.5 -115 + N/A N/A o56.5 -112  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
u53.5 -110 u16.5 -110 + N/A u15.5 -110 + N/A N/A u16.5 -104 + u15.5 -115 + N/A N/A u56.5 -108  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+270 +140 + N/A +130 + N/A N/A +142 + N/A N/A N/A +220  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-340 -170 + N/A -166 + N/A N/A -184 + N/A N/A N/A -285  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -110 + N/A N/A +2.5 -110 + +1.5 -115 + N/A N/A +7 -108  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -120 + N/A N/A -2.5 -120 + -1.5 -115 + N/A N/A -7 -112  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
o53.5 -110 o13 -110 + N/A o13.5 -115 + N/A N/A o13.5 -104 + o12.5 -130 + N/A N/A o56.5 -112  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
u53.5 -110 u13 -110 + N/A u13.5 -115 + N/A N/A u13.5 -120 + u12.5 even + N/A N/A u56.5 -108  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+270 +145 + N/A +140 + N/A N/A +172 + N/A N/A N/A +220  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-340 -170 + N/A -180 + N/A N/A -215 + N/A N/A N/A -285  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+9.5 -110 +0.5 -120 + N/A +1.5 -115 + N/A N/A +1.5 -130 + +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A +7 -108  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-9.5 -110 -0.5 even + N/A -1.5 -115 + N/A N/A -1.5 -102 + -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A -7 -112  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
o53.5 -110 o14.5 -105 + N/A o14.5 -115 + N/A N/A o13.5 -142 + o14.5 +105 + N/A N/A o56.5 -112  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
u53.5 -110 u14.5 -115 + N/A u14.5 -115 + N/A N/A u13.5 +114 + u14.5 -135 + N/A N/A u56.5 -108  
Ole Miss Rebels 391 Ole Miss
+270 +125 + N/A +145 + N/A N/A +126 + N/A N/A N/A +220  
Georgia Bulldogs 392 Georgia
-340 -150 + N/A -188 + N/A N/A -164 + N/A N/A N/A -285  

These two teams are eerily similar in my mind. Georgia's defense is a shell of its former self, especially in the passing game. However, Ole Miss has had trouble defending against the run. Offensively, Ole Miss has an edge in the passing game and a very slight edge in the run game.

Ole Miss is 17th in late-down success, where Georgia's defense is 79th. Ole Miss' defensive line is poised to pressure Gunner Stockton, and I think Ole Miss will make the day long for the Georgia Bulldogs.

Ole Miss vs. Georgia Best Bet: Ole Miss Rebels +7.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT bet365!

OHIO STATE VS. WISCONSIN BEST BET

OSU @ WIS Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-28.5 -110 -14.5 even + -14.5 +105 + -14.5 +110 + -14.5 +105 + -14.5 even + -13.5 -122 + -14.5 +105 + -14.5 +105 -13.5 -129 + -25.5 -105  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+28.5 -110 +14.5 -120 + +14.5 -125 + +14.5 -130 + +14.5 -125 + +14.5 -130 + +13.5 -100 + +14.5 -125 + +14.5 -125 +13.5 even + +25.5 -115  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
o41.5 -115 o21.5 -110 + N/A o21.5 -110 + o21.5 -115 + N/A o22.5 -106 + o22.5 -110 + o22.5 -110 o21.5 -112 + o41.5 even  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
u41.5 -105 u21.5 -110 + N/A u21.5 -110 + u21.5 -105 + N/A u22.5 -114 + u22.5 -110 + u22.5 -110 u21.5 -117 + u41.5 -120  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-8000 -1400 + -1400 + -1450 + -1400 + -3000 + -2500 + N/A N/A -2500 + -3200  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+2200 +850 + +800 + +800 + +800 + +900 + +1040 + N/A N/A +900 + +1400  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-28.5 -110 -6.5 -130 + -6.5 -130 + -6.5 -125 + -6.5 -130 + N/A -6.5 -124 + -6.5 -160 + -7.5 +200 -6.5 -129 + -25.5 -105  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+28.5 -110 +6.5 even + +6.5 even + +6.5 -105 + +6.5 even + N/A +6.5 -100 + +6.5 +120 + +7.5 -300 +6.5 -103 + +25.5 -115  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
o41.5 -115 o7.5 -115 + N/A o7.5 -110 + o7.5 -115 + N/A o9.5 -112 + o9.5 -120 + o8.5 -110 o7.5 -112 + o41.5 even  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
u41.5 -105 u7.5 -115 + N/A u7.5 -120 + u7.5 -115 + N/A u9.5 -112 + u9.5 -110 + u8.5 -120 u7.5 -117 + u41.5 -120  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-8000 -750 + -700 + -620 + -600 + N/A -900 + N/A N/A -770 + -3200  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+2200 +475 + +425 + +400 + +420 + N/A +520 + N/A N/A +475 + +1400  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-28.5 -110 N/A N/A -10.5 -105 + -10.5 +105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -25.5 -105  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+28.5 -110 N/A N/A +10.5 -115 + +10.5 -125 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +25.5 -115  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
o41.5 -115 N/A N/A o17.5 -110 + o17.5 even + N/A N/A o17.5 +105 + N/A N/A o41.5 even  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
u41.5 -105 N/A N/A u17.5 -110 + u17.5 -120 + N/A N/A u17.5 -135 + N/A N/A u41.5 -120  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-8000 N/A N/A -1050 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -3200  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+2200 N/A N/A +675 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1400  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-28.5 -110 N/A N/A -7.5 -110 + N/A N/A -7.5 +102 + -7.5 even + N/A N/A -25.5 -105  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+28.5 -110 N/A N/A +7.5 -120 + N/A N/A +7.5 -136 + +7.5 -130 + N/A N/A +25.5 -115  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
o41.5 -115 o13 -115 + N/A o13.5 even + N/A N/A o13.5 -100 + o13.5 -115 + N/A N/A o41.5 even  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
u41.5 -105 u13 -115 + N/A u13.5 -130 + N/A N/A u13.5 -124 + u13.5 -115 + N/A N/A u41.5 -120  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-8000 -1100 + N/A -1300 + N/A N/A -1400 + N/A N/A N/A -3200  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+2200 +650 + N/A +600 + N/A N/A +680 + N/A N/A N/A +1400  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-28.5 -110 N/A N/A -6.5 -125 + N/A N/A -6.5 -136 + -6.5 -135 + N/A N/A -25.5 -105  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+28.5 -110 N/A N/A +6.5 -105 + N/A N/A +6.5 +102 + +6.5 +105 + N/A N/A +25.5 -115  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
o41.5 -115 o8.5 -115 + N/A o7.5 -105 + N/A N/A o9.5 -114 + o7.5 +115 + N/A N/A o41.5 even  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
u41.5 -105 u8.5 -115 + N/A u7.5 -125 + N/A N/A u9.5 -110 + u7.5 -150 + N/A N/A u41.5 -120  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-8000 -800 + N/A -620 + N/A N/A -950 + N/A N/A N/A -3200  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+2200 +500 + N/A +420 + N/A N/A +540 + N/A N/A N/A +1400  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-28.5 -110 -6 -115 + N/A -6.5 -110 + N/A N/A -6.5 -122 + -5.5 -120 + N/A N/A -25.5 -105  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+28.5 -110 +6 -115 + N/A +6.5 -120 + N/A N/A +6.5 -108 + +5.5 -110 + N/A N/A +25.5 -115  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
o41.5 -115 o7.5 -115 + N/A o9.5 -110 + N/A N/A o7.5 -112 + o7.5 +110 + N/A N/A o41.5 even  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
u41.5 -105 u7.5 -115 + N/A u9.5 -120 + N/A N/A u7.5 -112 + u7.5 -140 + N/A N/A u41.5 -120  
Ohio State Buckeyes 399 Ohio State
-8000 -550 + N/A -580 + N/A N/A -900 + N/A N/A N/A -3200  
Wisconsin Badgers 400 Wisconsin
+2200 +375 + N/A +390 + N/A N/A +500 + N/A N/A N/A +1400  

41.5 is a low-enough total to bet on explosive plays, and there is no doubt in my mind we see an Ohio State defensive score in this game. OSU's left side of their defensive line has extremely favorable matchups, and they are going to cause chaos for Hunter Simmons and this Wisconsin team. I would not be surprised if we get a final score of like 35-7, with Wisconsin scoring a late TD.

Ohio State vs. Wisconsin Best Bet: Ohio State Buckeyes @ Wisconsin Badgers o41.5 (-105)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT DraftKings!

MISSISSIPPI STATE VS. FLORIDA BEST BET

MSST @ FLA Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+9.5 -110 +6 -115 + +5.5 -105 + +5.5 -108 + +6 -115 + +5.5 -105 + +5.5 -108 + +6.5 -120 + +5.5 -105 +5.5 -108 + +10 -115  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-9.5 -110 -6 -105 + -5.5 -115 + -5.5 -112 + -6 -105 + -5.5 -125 + -5.5 -112 + -6.5 -105 + -5.5 -115 -5.5 -115 + -10 -105  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
o52.5 -112 o26.5 even + N/A o24.5 -110 + o25.5 -110 + N/A o26.5 -106 + o25.5 -115 + o24.5 -110 o25.5 -121 + o51.5 -110  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
u52.5 -108 u26.5 -120 + N/A u24.5 -110 + u25.5 -110 + N/A u26.5 -114 + u25.5 -110 + u24.5 -110 u25.5 -107 + u51.5 -110  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+270 +220 + +220 + +225 + +215 + +200 + +210 + N/A N/A +200 + +285  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-340 -270 + -275 + -278 + -267 + -280 + -265 + N/A N/A -278 + -360  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+9.5 -110 +3.5 -125 + +2.5 even + +2.5 -105 + +2.5 -105 + +2.5 even + +2.5 -106 + +2.5 even + +2.5 -105 +2.5 -103 + +10 -115  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-9.5 -110 -3.5 -105 + -2.5 -130 + -2.5 -125 + -2.5 -125 + -2.5 -130 + -2.5 -118 + -2.5 -125 + -2.5 -125 -2.5 -132 + -10 -105  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
o52.5 -112 o10.5 -105 + N/A o10.5 -105 + o10.5 even + o10.5 -110 + o10.5 +112 + o10.5 even + o10.5 even o10.5 +112 + o51.5 -110  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
u52.5 -108 u10.5 -125 + N/A u10.5 -125 + u10.5 -130 + u10.5 -120 + u10.5 -140 + u10.5 -130 + u10.5 -135 u10.5 -143 + u51.5 -110  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+270 +175 + +175 + +170 + +170 + +170 + +162 + N/A N/A +170 + +285  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-340 -225 + -225 + -220 + -210 + -240 + -215 + N/A N/A -230 + -360  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +4.5 -112 + +4.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +10 -115  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -4.5 -108 + -4.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -10 -105  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
o52.5 -112 N/A N/A o25.5 -108 + o24.5 -110 + N/A N/A o24.5 -110 + N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
u52.5 -108 N/A N/A u25.5 -112 + u24.5 -110 + N/A N/A u24.5 -115 + N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+270 N/A N/A +200 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +285  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-340 N/A N/A -245 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -360  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 even + N/A N/A +3.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A +10 -115  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -130 + N/A N/A -3.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A -10 -105  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
o52.5 -112 o14 -110 + N/A o13.5 -125 + N/A N/A o14.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
u52.5 -108 u14 -110 + N/A u13.5 -105 + N/A N/A u14.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+270 +150 + N/A +175 + N/A N/A +176 + N/A N/A N/A +285  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-340 -185 + N/A -230 + N/A N/A -230 + N/A N/A N/A -360  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -110 + N/A N/A +2.5 -100 + N/A N/A N/A +10 -115  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -120 + N/A N/A -2.5 -132 + N/A N/A N/A -10 -105  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
o52.5 -112 o12 -110 + N/A o10.5 -115 + N/A N/A o10.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
u52.5 -108 u12 -110 + N/A u10.5 -115 + N/A N/A u10.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+270 +160 + N/A +170 + N/A N/A +190 + N/A N/A N/A +285  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-340 -190 + N/A -220 + N/A N/A -250 + N/A N/A N/A -360  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+9.5 -110 +0.5 -110 + N/A +2.5 -120 + N/A N/A +2.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A +10 -115  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-9.5 -110 -0.5 -110 + N/A -2.5 -110 + N/A N/A -2.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -10 -105  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
o52.5 -112 o13.5 -115 + N/A o13.5 -130 + N/A N/A o13.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
u52.5 -108 u13.5 -105 + N/A u13.5 even + N/A N/A u13.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
Mississippi State Bulldogs 377 Mississippi State
+270 +135 + N/A +145 + N/A N/A +154 + N/A N/A N/A +285  
Florida Gators 378 Florida
-340 -160 + N/A -188 + N/A N/A -200 + N/A N/A N/A -360  

If you looked up the phrase "game Billy Napier loses" in the dictionary, you will find Mississippi State @ Florida on 10/18 at 4:15 PM ET. Florida has played a difficult schedule, and while their defense has shown up, their offense has been lackluster. DJ Lagway is always susceptible to the turnover bug, and Mississippi State is competent enough to capitalize off of those mistakes.

Mississippi State is 14th in EPA/rush, and their defense is not anything to sneeze at. Mississippi State is a live 'dog in this SEC matchup.

Mississippi State vs. Florida Best Bet: Mississippi State Bulldogs +9.5 (-105) + ML (+285)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT CAESARS!

PITTSBURGH VS. SYRACUSE BEST BET

PITT @ SYR Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-10.5 -110 -6.5 -105 + -6.5 even + -5.5 -112 + -5.5 -117 + -5.5 -115 + -6.5 -106 + -5.5 -115 + -5.5 -110 -5.5 -112 + -9.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+10.5 -110 +6.5 -115 + +6.5 -120 + +5.5 -108 + +5.5 -106 + +5.5 -115 + +6.5 -114 + +5.5 -110 + +5.5 -110 +5.5 -112 + +9.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
o56.5 -112 o27.5 -115 + N/A o27.5 -110 + o27.5 -115 + N/A o27.5 -108 + o27.5 -115 + o27.5 -115 o27.5 -104 + o54.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
u56.5 -108 u27.5 -105 + N/A u27.5 -110 + u27.5 -107 + N/A u27.5 -112 + u27.5 -110 + u27.5 -105 u27.5 -124 + u54.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-375 -275 + -275 + -270 + -280 + -280 + -265 + N/A N/A -250 + -355  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+295 +225 + +220 + +220 + +215 + +200 + +210 + N/A N/A +188 + +280  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-10.5 -110 -3.5 even + -3.5 even + -2.5 -130 + N/A -2.5 -130 + -2.5 -118 + -2.5 -125 + -3.5 even -2.5 -114 + -9.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+10.5 -110 +3.5 -130 + +3.5 -125 + +2.5 even + N/A +2.5 even + +2.5 -106 + +2.5 even + +3.5 -135 +2.5 -114 + +9.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
o56.5 -112 o12.5 -115 + N/A o12.5 -115 + N/A o12.5 -120 + o12.5 -116 + o10.5 -120 + o12.5 -115 o10.5 -114 + o54.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
u56.5 -108 u12.5 -115 + N/A u12.5 -115 + N/A u12.5 -110 + u12.5 -108 + u10.5 -105 + u12.5 -115 u10.5 -114 + u54.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-375 -210 + -235 + -210 + N/A -250 + -220 + N/A N/A -200 + -355  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+295 +165 + +180 + +160 + N/A +180 + +168 + N/A N/A +150 + +280  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -4.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -9.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +4.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +9.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
o56.5 -112 N/A N/A o26.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A o27.5 -105 + N/A N/A o54.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
u56.5 -108 N/A N/A u26.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A u27.5 -120 + N/A N/A u54.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-375 N/A N/A -238 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -355  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+295 N/A N/A +195 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +280  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -125 + N/A N/A -3.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A -9.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -105 + N/A N/A +3.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A +9.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
o56.5 -112 o16.5 -110 + N/A o16.5 -110 + N/A N/A o16.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A o54.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
u56.5 -108 u16.5 -110 + N/A u16.5 -120 + N/A N/A u16.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A u54.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-375 -225 + N/A -200 + N/A N/A -230 + N/A N/A N/A -355  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+295 +175 + N/A +154 + N/A N/A +176 + N/A N/A N/A +280  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -125 + N/A N/A -2.5 -122 + N/A N/A N/A -9.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -105 + N/A N/A +2.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A +9.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
o56.5 -112 o12.5 -110 + N/A o12.5 -120 + N/A N/A o13.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A o54.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
u56.5 -108 u12.5 -110 + N/A u12.5 -110 + N/A N/A u13.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A u54.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-375 -200 + N/A -215 + N/A N/A -225 + N/A N/A N/A -355  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+295 +165 + N/A +165 + N/A N/A +172 + N/A N/A N/A +280  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-10.5 -110 -0.5 -105 + N/A -2.5 -115 + N/A N/A -1.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -9.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+10.5 -110 +0.5 -115 + N/A +2.5 -115 + N/A N/A +1.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A +9.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
o56.5 -112 o14 -110 + N/A o13.5 -130 + N/A N/A o13.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A o54.5 -115  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
u56.5 -108 u14 -110 + N/A u13.5 even + N/A N/A u13.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A u54.5 -105  
Pittsburgh Panthers 357 Pittsburgh
-375 -165 + N/A -188 + N/A N/A -194 + N/A N/A N/A -355  
Syracuse Orange 358 Syracuse
+295 +140 + N/A +145 + N/A N/A +150 + N/A N/A N/A +280  

Syracuse has quietly faced the 9th-toughest strength of schedule according to PFF, while Pitt has faced the 80th, so while Pitt's stats look better than Syracuse's, they are a bit inflated. Syracuse gets the privilege of coming off of a bye, while Pitt is coming off of a close victory against Florida State. Syracuse has a higher big-time throw rate and a lower turnover-worthy play rate than their ACC counterpart.

I wouldn't be surprised if Syracuse head coach Fran Brown has some tricks up his sleeve in this one. Syracuse keeps it close.

Syracuse vs. Pittsburgh Best Bet: Syracuse Orange +11.5 (-115)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT FANDUEL!

USC VS. NOTRE DAME BEST BET

USC @ ND Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
USC Trojans 415 USC
+13.5 -110 +5.5 -110 + +5.5 -110 + +5.5 -110 + +5.5 -110 + +4.5 -110 + +5.5 -112 + +5.5 -110 + +5.5 -110 +6.5 -118 + +10 -112  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-13.5 -110 -5.5 -110 + -5.5 -110 + -5.5 -110 + -5.5 -110 + -4.5 -120 + -5.5 -108 + -5.5 -115 + -5.5 -110 -6.5 -106 + -10 -108  
USC Trojans 415 USC
o53.5 -110 o30.5 -115 + N/A o30.5 -118 + o30.5 -115 + N/A o30.5 -118 + o30.5 -115 + o30.5 -115 o30.5 -113 + o60.5 -115  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
u53.5 -110 u30.5 -105 + N/A u30.5 -102 + u30.5 -105 + N/A u30.5 -104 + u30.5 -110 + u30.5 -105 u30.5 -117 + u60.5 -105  
USC Trojans 415 USC
+285 +225 + +200 + +205 + +210 + +200 + +205 + N/A N/A +210 + +260  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-360 -275 + -250 + -250 + -260 + -280 + -250 + N/A N/A -295 + -325  
USC Trojans 415 USC
+13.5 -110 +3.5 -130 + +3.5 -125 + +3.5 -120 + +3.5 -125 + +3.5 -125 + +1.5 -116 + +3.5 -120 + +2.5 even +2.5 +102 + +10 -112  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-13.5 -110 -3.5 even + -3.5 -105 + -3.5 -110 + -3.5 -105 + -3.5 -105 + -1.5 -108 + -3.5 -105 + -2.5 -135 -2.5 -134 + -10 -108  
USC Trojans 415 USC
o53.5 -110 o13.5 -120 + N/A o13.5 -115 + o13.5 -125 + o13.5 -120 + o13.5 -122 + o13.5 -125 + o13.5 -120 o13.5 -115 + o60.5 -115  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
u53.5 -110 u13.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -115 + u13.5 -105 + u13.5 -110 + u13.5 -102 + u13.5 even + u13.5 -110 u13.5 -113 + u60.5 -105  
USC Trojans 415 USC
+285 +165 + +155 + +165 + +165 + +160 + +148 + N/A N/A +163 + +260  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-360 -210 + -210 + -215 + -200 + -220 + -188 + N/A N/A -215 + -325  
USC Trojans 415 USC
+13.5 -110 N/A N/A +5.5 -108 + +4.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +10 -112  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-13.5 -110 N/A N/A -5.5 -112 + -4.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -10 -108  
USC Trojans 415 USC
o53.5 -110 N/A N/A o29.5 -112 + o29.5 -110 + N/A N/A o30.5 -105 + N/A N/A o60.5 -115  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
u53.5 -110 N/A N/A u29.5 -108 + u29.5 -110 + N/A N/A u30.5 -120 + N/A N/A u60.5 -105  
USC Trojans 415 USC
+285 N/A N/A +200 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +260  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-360 N/A N/A -245 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -325  
USC Trojans 415 USC
+13.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -115 + N/A N/A +3.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A +10 -112  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-13.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -115 + N/A N/A -3.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A -10 -108  
USC Trojans 415 USC
o53.5 -110 o17 -110 + N/A o17.5 even + N/A N/A o17.5 +106 + N/A N/A N/A o60.5 -115  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
u53.5 -110 u17 -110 + N/A u17.5 -130 + N/A N/A u17.5 -135 + N/A N/A N/A u60.5 -105  
USC Trojans 415 USC
+285 +155 + N/A +154 + N/A N/A +180 + N/A N/A N/A +260  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-360 -190 + N/A -200 + N/A N/A -230 + N/A N/A N/A -325  
USC Trojans 415 USC
+13.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -110 + N/A N/A +3.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A +10 -112  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-13.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -120 + N/A N/A -3.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A -10 -108  
USC Trojans 415 USC
o53.5 -110 o13.5 -120 + N/A o13.5 -145 + N/A N/A o13.5 -140 + N/A N/A N/A o60.5 -115  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
u53.5 -110 u13.5 even + N/A u13.5 +114 + N/A N/A u13.5 +114 + N/A N/A N/A u60.5 -105  
USC Trojans 415 USC
+285 +150 + N/A +170 + N/A N/A +200 + N/A N/A N/A +260  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-360 -180 + N/A -220 + N/A N/A -260 + N/A N/A N/A -325  
USC Trojans 415 USC
+13.5 -110 +0.5 -115 + N/A +1.5 -115 + N/A N/A +1.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A +10 -112  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-13.5 -110 -0.5 -105 + N/A -1.5 -115 + N/A N/A -1.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A -10 -108  
USC Trojans 415 USC
o53.5 -110 o16 -110 + N/A o15.5 -110 + N/A N/A o14.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A o60.5 -115  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
u53.5 -110 u16 -110 + N/A u15.5 -120 + N/A N/A u14.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A u60.5 -105  
USC Trojans 415 USC
+285 +135 + N/A +145 + N/A N/A +146 + N/A N/A N/A +260  
Notre Dame Fighting Irish 416 Notre Dame
-360 -160 + N/A -188 + N/A N/A -186 + N/A N/A N/A -325  

USC has one of the best offenses in college football. They are currently rated #1 in EPA/pass and #4 in EPA/rush. They are top 5 in both early-downs EPA/play and late-down success rate. This offense will be going against a Notre Dame defense that is half as strong as they were last season.

USC also has the #1 rated safety in the country according to PFF, Bishop Fitzgerald. USC's offensive line did not allow a sack against Michigan last week (one of the strongest pass-rush units in the country). I think USC wins this game and knocks Notre Dame out of playoff contention.

USC vs. Notre Dame Best Bet: USC Trojans +9.5 (-105) + ML (+275)

Check out our full USC vs. Notre Dame prediction.


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT BetMGM!

MISSOURI VS. AUBURN BEST BET

MIZ @ AUB Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+1.5 -110 -0.5 even + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 +105 + -0.5 even + -0.5 -105 + -1.5 +114 + -0.5 even + -0.5 +105 -1.5 +106 + -1.5 -110  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-1.5 -110 +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -125 + +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -125 + +1.5 -140 + +0.5 -125 + +0.5 -125 +1.5 -148 + +1.5 -110  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
o44.5 -110 o21.5 even + N/A o21.5 -102 + o21.5 even + N/A o22.5 -105 + o21.5 even + o21.5 even o20.5 -125 + o43.5 -115  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
u44.5 -110 u21.5 -120 + N/A u21.5 -118 + u21.5 -120 + N/A u22.5 -115 + u21.5 -125 + u21.5 -120 u20.5 -104 + u43.5 -105  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+102 -120 + -125 + -115 + -115 + -125 + -115 + N/A N/A -125 + -122  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-122 even + +105 + -105 + -105 + -105 + -105 + N/A N/A -104 + +102  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+1.5 -110 -0.5 +120 + -0.5 +115 + -0.5 +120 + -0.5 +115 + -0.5 +120 + -1.5 +146 + -0.5 +120 + -0.5 +125 -1.5 +138 + -1.5 -110  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-1.5 -110 +0.5 -140 + +0.5 -150 + +0.5 -154 + +0.5 -145 + +0.5 -150 + +1.5 -184 + +0.5 -150 + +0.5 -170 +1.5 -180 + +1.5 -110  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
o44.5 -110 o9.5 -115 + N/A o9.5 -115 + o9.5 -115 + o9.5 -120 + o7.5 -114 + o9.5 -120 + o9.5 -115 o7.5 -117 + o43.5 -115  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
u44.5 -110 u9.5 -115 + N/A u9.5 -115 + u9.5 -115 + u9.5 -110 + u7.5 -116 + u9.5 -105 + u9.5 -115 u7.5 -108 + u43.5 -105  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+102 -130 + -135 + -130 + -130 + -130 + -115 + N/A N/A -122 + -122  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-122 +110 + even + even + even + even + -108 + N/A N/A -106 + +102  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +114 + +0.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -110  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -135 + -0.5 +110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -110  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
o44.5 -110 N/A N/A o21.5 -105 + o20.5 -120 + N/A N/A o20.5 -130 + N/A N/A o43.5 -115  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
u44.5 -110 N/A N/A u21.5 -115 + u20.5 even + N/A N/A u20.5 even + N/A N/A u43.5 -105  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+102 N/A N/A -120 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -122  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-122 N/A N/A even + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +102  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A -1.5 +128 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -110  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A +1.5 -172 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -110  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
o44.5 -110 o10.5 -110 + N/A o10.5 -110 + N/A N/A o13.5 +112 + N/A N/A N/A o43.5 -115  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
u44.5 -110 u10.5 -110 + N/A u10.5 -120 + N/A N/A u13.5 -140 + N/A N/A N/A u43.5 -105  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+102 -115 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -115 + N/A N/A N/A -122  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-122 -105 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -111 + N/A N/A N/A +102  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +135 + N/A N/A -1.5 +140 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -110  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -175 + N/A N/A +1.5 -188 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -110  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
o44.5 -110 o9 -110 + N/A o8.5 -120 + N/A N/A o9.5 -116 + N/A N/A N/A o43.5 -115  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
u44.5 -110 u9 -110 + N/A u8.5 -110 + N/A N/A u9.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A u43.5 -105  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+102 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -122 + N/A N/A N/A -122  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-122 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -104 + N/A N/A N/A +102  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+1.5 -110 -0.5 +145 + N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +134 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -110  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-1.5 -110 +0.5 -170 + N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -182 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -110  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
o44.5 -110 o10.5 -110 + N/A o12.5 -120 + N/A N/A o10.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A o43.5 -115  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
u44.5 -110 u10.5 -110 + N/A u12.5 -110 + N/A N/A u10.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A u43.5 -105  
Missouri Tigers 381 Missouri
+102 -110 + N/A -125 + N/A N/A -118 + N/A N/A N/A -122  
Auburn Tigers 382 Auburn
-122 -110 + N/A -105 + N/A N/A -108 + N/A N/A N/A +102  

This is purely a pace play. Missouri averages 78.2 offensive snaps per game, while Auburn is averaging 70.8. Missouri's offense is extremely efficient, as they are 5th in net EPA/play and 9th in offensive success rate.

There is also a similar dynamic in this game as there is in Ohio State vs. Wisconsin, where I am almost banking on an explosive defensive score from Missouri to get this total over. Their defense is so strong, and they are going to make Jackson Arnold's day long.

Missouri vs. Auburn Best Bet: Missouri Tigers @ Auburn Tigers o43.5 (-110)

Check out our full Missouri vs. Auburn Prediction.


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT bet365!

STANFORD VS. FLORIDA STATE BEST BET

FSU @ STAN Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-16.5 -110 -9.5 -115 + -9.5 -118 + -9.5 -120 + -9.5 -120 + -9.5 -130 + -9.5 -122 + -9.5 -125 + -9.5 -115 -9.5 -115 + -17.5 -115  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+16.5 -110 +9.5 -105 + +9.5 -102 + +9.5 even + +9.5 even + +9.5 even + +9.5 -100 + +9.5 -105 + +9.5 -105 +9.5 -108 + +17.5 -105  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
o54.5 -108 o27.5 -110 + N/A o27.5 -112 + o27.5 -110 + N/A o27.5 -105 + o27.5 -115 + o27.5 -110 o28.5 -109 + o54.5 -105  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
u54.5 -112 u27.5 -110 + N/A u27.5 -108 + u27.5 -110 + N/A u27.5 -115 + u27.5 -110 + u27.5 -110 u28.5 -120 + u54.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-950 -550 + -500 + -575 + -600 + -600 + -550 + N/A N/A -500 + -950  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+625 +400 + +375 + +425 + +430 + +340 + +390 + N/A N/A +340 + +625  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-16.5 -110 -5.5 -115 + -5.5 -110 + -4.5 -115 + -5.5 -115 + -5.5 -120 + -4.5 +102 + -5.5 -115 + -5.5 -110 -4.5 -110 + -17.5 -115  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+16.5 -110 +5.5 -115 + +5.5 -118 + +4.5 -115 + +5.5 -115 + +5.5 -110 + +4.5 -128 + +5.5 -110 + +5.5 -120 +4.5 -117 + +17.5 -105  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
o54.5 -108 o12.5 -120 + N/A o10.5 -115 + o12.5 -125 + o12.5 -125 + o10.5 -112 + o12.5 -125 + o10.5 -120 o12.5 -125 + o54.5 -105  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
u54.5 -112 u12.5 -110 + N/A u10.5 -115 + u12.5 -105 + u12.5 -105 + u10.5 -114 + u12.5 -105 + u10.5 -110 u12.5 -104 + u54.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-950 -330 + -325 + -330 + -300 + -420 + -350 + N/A N/A -345 + -950  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+625 +240 + +240 + +240 + +240 + +270 + +255 + N/A N/A +245 + +625  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-16.5 -110 N/A N/A -7.5 -115 + -7.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -17.5 -115  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+16.5 -110 N/A N/A +7.5 -105 + +7.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +17.5 -105  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
o54.5 -108 N/A N/A o25.5 -108 + o25.5 -105 + N/A N/A o24.5 -110 + N/A N/A o54.5 -105  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
u54.5 -112 N/A N/A u25.5 -112 + u25.5 -115 + N/A N/A u24.5 -115 + N/A N/A u54.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-950 N/A N/A -455 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -950  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+625 N/A N/A +350 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +625  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-16.5 -110 N/A N/A -4.5 -110 + N/A N/A -6.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -17.5 -115  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+16.5 -110 N/A N/A +4.5 -120 + N/A N/A +6.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A +17.5 -105  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
o54.5 -108 o16 -110 + N/A o16.5 -115 + N/A N/A o16.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A o54.5 -105  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
u54.5 -112 u16 -110 + N/A u16.5 -115 + N/A N/A u16.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A u54.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-950 -330 + N/A -345 + N/A N/A -400 + N/A N/A N/A -950  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+625 +240 + N/A +260 + N/A N/A +285 + N/A N/A N/A +625  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-16.5 -110 N/A N/A -5.5 -115 + N/A N/A -3.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A -17.5 -115  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+16.5 -110 N/A N/A +5.5 -115 + N/A N/A +3.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A +17.5 -105  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
o54.5 -108 o10.5 -105 + N/A o12.5 -115 + N/A N/A o12.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A o54.5 -105  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
u54.5 -112 u10.5 -115 + N/A u12.5 -115 + N/A N/A u12.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A u54.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-950 -390 + N/A -375 + N/A N/A -350 + N/A N/A N/A -950  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+625 +290 + N/A +270 + N/A N/A +250 + N/A N/A N/A +625  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-16.5 -110 -3 -110 + N/A -3.5 -115 + N/A N/A -4.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A -17.5 -115  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+16.5 -110 +3 -110 + N/A +3.5 -115 + N/A N/A +4.5 -125 + N/A N/A N/A +17.5 -105  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
o54.5 -108 o13.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 -130 + N/A N/A o13.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A o54.5 -105  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
u54.5 -112 u13.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 even + N/A N/A u13.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A u54.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 419 Florida State
-950 -230 + N/A -280 + N/A N/A -330 + N/A N/A N/A -950  
Stanford Cardinal 420 Stanford
+625 +185 + N/A +210 + N/A N/A +255 + N/A N/A N/A +625  

We have to get gross for one game, right? Florida State has been on a skid dating back to September 26th, losing to Virginia, Miami (FL), and Pitt. Two of those losses were as touchdown favorites or greater. The stats don't look great for Stanford, but this is a play on the current status of FSU, and I think their rating is inflated due to their win against Alabama at the beginning of the season.

Stanford pulls off the upset in this ACC matchup.

Stanford vs. Florida State Best Bet: Stanford Cardinal +17.5 (-115) + ML (+650)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT bet365!

I would love to hear from you all. You can interact with me on Threads and best of luck this week!

Featured News

Dylan Wilkerson

Dylan Wilkerson

Dylan Wilkerson has over 5 years of experience reporting and analyzing the sports betting industry for various sites. His portfolio includes work for SportsHandle and Action Network, in addition to VegasInsider. His favorite sports are the NFL, College Football, The PGA Tour, the LIV Tour, and Cricket. Dylan has a broad and deep understanding of various sports-related topics. More from Dylan Wilkerson
•